Simon Phipps wrote: > On Mar 26, 2008, at 22:37, Darren Davis wrote: >> Simon Phipps wrote: >>> On Mar 26, 2008, at 22:15, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >>> >>>> It doesn't seem like the bubbles will stand on their own for brand >>>> recognition the way the penguin does for Linux or the demon does for >>>> FreeBSD. >>>> >>> I don't think they are meant to - those are mascots, not logos >>> (FreeBSD has a logo too - I'm not aware that Linux does though). >>> The wordmark isn't going away, and I hope we're also going to end >>> up with a mascot to stand hand-in-hand with Tux and the demon. As >>> most of you know I hope that will be a polar bear. With sunglasses. >>> >> Linux itself does not have a logo, just the mascot, but all the >> individual distributions do. Which is essentially the same as in >> BSD. Mascot for the base, logos for each BSD distribution. > > Sounds like the ideal arrangement here. Maybe we should just forget > the logo and worry about a mascot? > > S.
What about branding the binary distribution? Shouldn't that have a logo? Is your preference to use the wordmark and take longer for an accompanying logo? Patrick
