On Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:51:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time izzy Meyer wrote: > Curious why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that they > made themselves vulnerable about. Sure- you have your views on things, > and that's totally cool. But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of > someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time? People serve process with mental health allegations that sticks worse than a felony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they want others to be forgiving of them?
A lot of people have drug trips and "experiences" they don't really want to repeat or else they end up with tattoos that they "regret" later if that is the right word when they never really wanted them in the first place. Mental health services, like those of astrologers or magicians, psychics, tarot card readers, palmists, have gained far too much of a sheen of legitimacy (or color of law, as it were) in court for service of process and summons to appear -- Say does a person really have an organic "mental illness" of known etiology? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process with a catch-all diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a court of law for some other legal summons? And what sorts of psychotropic "medications" or drugs are being offered on a more or less voluntary or involuntary basis to unwanted users of OpenBSD by Mr. Trudeau's and now Mark Carney's Liberal Party? Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because it's the law: immoral drug dealing is immoral drug dealing. Guns are banned in Canada and there's rubber-hose cryptanalysis, if you will.
