To be fair, I think XLibre's position on DEI doesn't
make much sense. They say there is no DEI
and immediately follow up saying
everyone is allowed to contribute...

But technically yes, there are a ton
of cases of big companies misusing DEI.

And for example, if someone refers to such
annexed land as "Crimea", intentionally,
you do technically have a stance that can
support whatever the reader's perspective is.

I am not aware of OpenBSD moderating
small email providers other than
graylisting them in some cases.

I was also never integrating DEI into OpenBSD,
merely just replacing some language.
In fact, the specific "DEI" diff is simply just
a vulgar word that probably should be removed
if it wasn't simply in a wordlist.
It is like removing F bombs.

Some things I do could be considered lefty
but I am definitely not far left.

Oct 6, 2025 11:17:51 AM UDENIX <[email protected]>:

> 
>> The OpenBSD operating system itself is pretty good, my main issue is
>> just that the /usr partition size can be really small in a lot of
>> cases.
>> I do largely agree with some of the legal related goals of the
>> project, https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>> But my main issues with OpenBSD is on the mailing lists...Read on if
>> you'd like to read a story.
>> ~~~
>> About a month ago I submitted a diff to tech@ removing a word from the
>> web2 / words file.
>> Theo rejected it with a harsh reply and it put a pretty bad taste
>> in my mouth.
> 
> I just read Theo de Raath's response and laughed out loud for quite a while. 
> I love that this project has no place for people who take offense at 
> everything.
> 
>> Yesterday I submitted a sort of issue/problem (not really a glitch) to
>> misc@ and got a pretty blunt reply from a random
>> Gmail...not from an OpenBSD member and I didn't really care.
>> Just deleted it and moved on.
> 
> I think that if they are going to moderate small email providers such as 
> cock.li, they should do the same with large email providers such as gmail.com.
> 
>> Then a developer sent me an email with a diff to fix the issue,
>> but I don't have commit access. Why they sent it to me I don't know,
>> maybe for me to forward it but I'm not sure. I ended up replying.
>> It was only today that I learned about one of OpenBSD's goals
>> which is to not be political. Such progressive changes are
>> definitely not technical and now I've learned it doesn't
>> make any sense under their goals.
> 
> Social life inserts us into networks of power (politics) and systems of 
> meaning (religion). Even the attempt at neutrality is already a way of taking 
> a stand. Therefore, being 100% apolitical or areligious is, in practice, 
> impossible.
> 
>> And to be clear, I am not out here to make OpenBSD some
>> communist far-left project.
> 
> Thank you, there are already too many open source projects like that. Just 
> look at the position some Linux distributions have taken on X11Libre simply 
> because the lead developer recognizes that "DEI" or similar policies 
> inevitably lead to discrimination against heterosexual white men and, when it 
> comes to choosing people, they prioritize a person's race, gender, ethnicity, 
> sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, or religion over their 
> skills.
> 
>> And yes, my first diff was definitely pretty surface-level
>> like some replies said, looking at fortunes-o it is pretty
>> offensive. By that old logic I'd have to empty basically
>> the entire file.
>> ~~~
>> I do like OpenBSD as a project. The correctness approach
>> from OpenBSD really changed how I wrote code, ever so slightly.
>> Keep doing what you're doing. Especially the actual coding work.
>> _Maybe_ enforce the harrassment and bullying rule of the list a
>> bit more.
>> 

Reply via email to