On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:50:58 -0700 "Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another thing that could help would be to go thru the existing success stories and make sure all those sites are still in business. Volounteers?
Do we really need to do that? While the business might not have been
a success their previous use of mod_perl was still a success right?
We should make sure all of the links to websites are still valid, but other than that I don't see anything wrong with leaving the story up.
The stories without URLs, for the most part, won't be researched by anyone to see if they are still in business anyway . Also some of
the stories only list "my former employer", "one of my consulting
contracts", etc.
I agree with Frank.
+1 to keep all the stories intact, just to remove the URLs if they are dead and can't be adjusted.
If everyone agrees with me on this I'd be more than willing to double check all of the links and correct some of the English errors I spotted. Is this section of the website in CVS that I can patch against?
Yup, there are .txt files in modperl-docs/src/outstanding/success_stories/ (they get translated to pod by running ./make.pl in that directory) and there is a related modperl-docs/src/outstanding/sites.html in case you want to review it as well.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
