Saul and Michael,
Let me suggest to you and to all those really interested in the issue of art
versus nonart to read my book ART VERSUS NONART: ART OUT OF MIND, Cambridge
University Press, 2003. I dare say that you might find there an infinitely
more thorough discussion of the issue you present to this forum.

Tsion Avital
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holon Institute of Technology. P.O.B 305, Holon 58102. Israel. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "An 'aesthetic experience' MAKES the work 'art'"

Cheerskep:

> Saul, suppose you and I look at a painting. You say, "Now, that's a  
> work of
> art."  And I say, "No, that's a work of foopgoom."
>
> You say to me, "What the hell is 'foopgoom'?"
>
> I say to you, "What the hell is 'art'?"
>
> How would either of us go about showing the other was "wrong"?

You know, this stuff wasn't invented yesterday. "Art," or pictures, or  
foopgoom, or whatever it [redacted verb], has been around for a long  
time, much longer than any of us has been looking at and discussing  
"it."

By now, we have a pretty good idea of what it [redacted verb] we're  
talking about.

The squabbling doesn't arise over the term itself, but over how it's  
applied and where its coverage ends. If Saul says. "Now, that's a work  
of art," I doubt you *completely misunderstand* him. I suspect either  
you disagree--e.g., if it seems he's using the term honorifically to  
denote exceptional quality of one kind or other that you don't  
perceive--or you dispute some aspect of how the term fits the object.

Frankly, the test isn't whether either of you can "go about showing  
the other was 'wrong'," but of explaining you own point.

> Even more interesting, how would you go about proving to me  
> (assuming this
> would be your position) that there is no such thing as "foopgoom",  
> it's just
> muddled notion in my mind?


I suspect after initially being very vexed by your foopgoom gambit,  
Saul would say, "Hell, what you call 'foopgoom' is the same thing I  
call 'art.' Now we can at least get past this inane distraction and  
talk about the serious stuff."



| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3289 (20080722) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3289 (20080722) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Reply via email to