In a message dated 7/25/08 11:31:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The following description you provide of your notion behind the word > 'ontology' is basically defective because it assumes as "given" many of the > very > elements that someone like me would reject: > > "An ontology is-the formal representations within a domain and the > relationships within the domain. I would suggest that cheerskep is > insisting > on > defining the individuals of the domain > before the domain itself has been tentatively defined." > > Feh! Feh, I tell you! > Which elements are they-and in this case, define element please. KAte Sullivan ************** Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
