The question is can something material give rise to something immaterial?
People have always claimed that magic for themselves but do they claim it for
other creatures and any living thing at all?  Wait,  some people even say
inanimate things without brains, like rocks, can have thoughts or can have
feelings.

I very deeply want to be a dualist.  It would solve a lot of issues
that make it 
more comfortable to be a human being. 
wc    


----- Original
Message ----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To:
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, May 16, 2012 11:18:52 AM
Subject: Re:
"...The realm of emotion and conscience, of memory and  intention 
and
sensation."

William   writes:


>  No brains no thoughts. Show me a thought
>
independent of a living brain and I'll reconsider the dualist position.
>
But
the dualist position is not that consciousness is independent of brain
substance and activity. It's that consciousness is not itself material.
Dualists are not uniformly dumb people. Do look into the Chalmers.   Dualism
is
not my specialty, so I'm a poor spokesman. I grant that if you pinch my
flesh you stir the brain to activity, but I can't concede that the neural
writhing "is" my feeling of pain. The fire in the fireplace affects my skin
and,
through nerve connections, my brain. But I'd no more consider my feeling
of
warmth to be "identical" with the neural activity than I'd say my warmth is
identical to the fire. A typical specialist's argument is that if you
describe
every possible thing about the material activity in the brain you
still
haven't described my feeling.

William continues:
>  The origin of this
dualism is the Bible and the expression,  In
> the
> beginning there was The
Word. 
> wc
>
I'm not quite as unthinking as that suggests, William. The
"origin" of MY
dualist convictions is not the bible.
>
>
> ----- Original
Message ----
> From:
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To:
[email protected]
> Sent:
> Wed, May 16, 2012 9:10:41 AM
> Subject:
Re: "...The realm of emotion and
> conscience, of memory and  intention
> and
sensation."
>
> In a message dated
> 5/16/12 9:49:34 AM,
[email protected] writes:
>
>
> > And it can't happen
> without a living,
pulsing brain.  Oops, that's the
> > realm of
> > the physical,
> ain't it?
>
> wc
> >
> > Dualists don't deny the physical, neural world. But, as
> Updike
conveys,
> their honest conviction is that a feeling, a thought, is not a
>
material thing.
> See David Chalmers's anthology, PHILOSOPHY OF MIND:
Classical
> and
> Contemporary Readings.

Reply via email to