On May 16, 2012, at 10:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Awful lot of stuff bumping around then. And what kind of corpus anyway. > All I mean is that if a lot of wet ware produces thoughts then what is > the difference between that and "something material giving rise to > something immaterial" except a more felicitous phrasing?
How can you discern the difference between an 'immaterial' thought and the pattern of synapses and other neural activity that creates/gives rise to/is coextensive with the thought? As far as we can determine, the thought is equivalent to and coincident with the neural activity. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady
