Actually I'm busy rethinking what representation means in various frameworks - in December I actually had time to go back and look at the assumptions I had about images, language and semiotics and came to the realization that I had substituted some vernacular interpretations for very specific terms. My last two post reflect this attempt at revisingmy understandings.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05 AM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote: > C'mon aesthetics listers, time to get up and start the brain! This list > used to > be so much fun with all sorts of postings, now reduced to quotations from > Berg. > Maybe you are all twittering and texting instead. Maybe you're -- gulp -- > actually reading books. I want to know if Collingwood still makes sense > for > aesthetics. > > Get up, get up, nations rise and fall by noon. > > WC > > -- S a u l O s t r o w *Critical Voices* 21STREETPROJECTS La Table Ronde 162 West 21 Street NYC, NY 10011 [email protected] www.21stprojects.org
