I've always figured it was best to just keep our 900mhz stuff on 5.6.9 (not that we have much 900mhz ubnt)... it seems to me that with since the majority of the changes in 6.0+ are related to AC backwards compatibility, it's more likely to cause problems than improve anything.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 2:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net > wrote: > > i don't think we saw it either on our 900, but a lot of people did > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com> > *To:* af@af.afmug.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:55 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti 2.4 > > I have 6.1.6 XM running and am not experiencing that issue.I rebooted it > last week at which time it had been up almost two months, with clients > connected for 50+ days. > > On 06/27/2018 12:40 PM, Timothy Steele wrote: > > It will kick client off the AP you need to use the old 5.5 firmware > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 12:58 PM Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com > > <mailto:w...@csilogan.com <w...@csilogan.com>>> wrote: > > > > What's up with the 900 Mhz and latest firmware? > > > > On 06/21/2018 11:01 PM, Timothy Steele wrote: > > > Sounds like interference issue latest firmware is very solid > > unless your > > > running 900mhz > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 5:22 PM Jason McKemie > > > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > > <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>> > > > <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > > <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > I'm having a bit of a head-scratcher here. I've got a Ubiquiti > > > Nanostation that I'm using as an AP for a small repeater > > site. All > > > of the CPE's attached to it dropped in TX signal strength by > > about > > > 15-20db. I tried switching the Nanostation out thinking maybe it > > > was going deaf, but the problem persisted. Then I tried > > switching > > > to the opposite end of the band (was at the low end). > > Problem went > > > away. Is there something I'm not aware of from a regulatory > > > standpoint that has been added in newer firmware or is this a > > bug? > > > It didn't seem to have nearly as much of an effect on the > > AP's TX, > > > so I'm leaning towards a bug. > > > > > > -Jason > > > -- > > > AF mailing list > > > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com <AF@af.afmug.com>> < > mailto:AF@af.afmug.com <AF@af.afmug.com> > > <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com <AF@af.afmug.com>>> > > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com <AF@af.afmug.com>> > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
