patents and intellectual property can't be damaged?
oh, i strongly disagree.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mathew Howard 
  To: AFMUG 
  Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 1:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium


  I'm certainly not qualified to argue the legal merits of the case, but it 
seems to me (as an observer who in reality knows nothing about it), that they 
wouldn't be able to show any significant damages from the things that actually 
seem to have merit... so they through all the other stuff in there.


  They could maybe get in trouble with the FCC, but until that happens, it's 
kind of hard to argue that it's harmed them. And if they argue that their sales 
were hurt by copyright violations (or whatever it is they're trying to say), I 
would think that's going to be tough to prove... Cambium could even argue that 
their customer started buying UBNT CPE because they're cheaper than the Cambium 
equivalent.



  On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:54 PM David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> 
wrote:

    I guess when reading this, the thing that strikes me the most is how 
inflated and exaggerative the language is.  Typically it seems in legal 
documents that overly exaggerative claims are done so for publicity.   The 
language in this filing seems to read more like National Enquirer and less like 
an FCC findings summary.  I would expect this to be less outlandish if they 
really felt they had a strong case.   Claiming a multi-party hacking conspiracy 
(which is really what the complaint is claiming from what I can discern) is 
going to be really tough to make stick.   Claiming Cambium caused harm to their 
business due to copyright violation would be a much better approach I would 
think.   But they seem to have taken the National Enquirer approach, usually 
when you hear those kinds of things, they don’t go anywhere.   It will be 
interesting to see what happens.   



    As far as the FCC violation goes, they were more careful in their wording.  
 To my understanding, they basically said that hacking the firmware gives 
someone the ability to violate FCC limits and doesn’t imply that they can prove 
anyone actually did.   



    Could be they felt that they were compelled to file this case whether they 
feel they can win or not….. 



    Smarter folks than me will sort it all out…. 😊



    Regards,



    David Coudron

    From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Ryan Ray
    Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 12:42 PM
    To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium



    They named a forum user as a defendant... 



    " 126. In a post dated December 25, 2017, Defendant Dmitry—noted as an 
“occasional contributor”—posted on a message board instructing a user on how to 
use ePMP with Ubiquiti power supplies"



    This whole thing feels like a big joke. Do we not own the hardware we're 
purchasing? 



    On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

      Yeah, so they aren't actually suing the WISP because they were using it, 
they're suing them because they're saying they helped market it.



      On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:27 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

        Case study\testimonial.



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions

        Midwest Internet Exchange

        The Brothers WISP






------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: ja...@remotelylocated.com
        To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
        Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 12:24:56 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

        How does UBNT know that the WISP in question is actually using the 
product?  Did they gain access to the carriers network to verify? With out them 
knowing? Other than that it is all hearsay. 

        Sent from my iPhone


        On Aug 10, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

          A juror who was an existing Cambium or UBNT customer might have a 
pre-existing bias and ought to be removed.
          .....not that I know anything about it.  Not really my department.



          On 8/10/2018 1:15 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:



            the jury isn't going to have a clue what you're talking about.  in 
fact, they're not going to understand most of the techno babble.

            unless they manage to land a juror who has run cambium or ubnt 
gear, that is going to be irrelevant...



              ----- Original Message ----- 

              From: Robert Andrews 

              To: af@af.afmug.com 

              Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 10:11 AM

              Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium



              So much for being the winner by disruption...   Yeah, you could 
see this 
              coming.   Dear Robert has a lot of expenses...  I just replaced a 
bunch 
              of legacy ubnt because of flat out chip failure.   Old 
electronics that 
              fail not because of exposure to discharges or stuff like that.  
Just too 
              cheap run too hot...

              On 08/10/2018 08:00 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
              > I imagine the reason it didn't happen sooner, is because of the 
fact 
              > that it makes Ubiquiti look really bad (especially the part 
about suing 
              > a WISP... ). Also, they were probably trying to come up with an 
argument 
              > that would hold up.
              > 
              > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:55 AM Jason McKemie 
              > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
              > <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>> wrote:
              > 
              >     I'm surprised this didn't happen sooner. The whole elevate 
thing was
              >     asking for it.
              > 
              >     On Friday, August 10, 2018, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net
              >     <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
              > 
              >         
https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/1660546944070751
              > 
              >         Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.​ sues Cambium Networks​.
              > 
              >         
https://www.law360.com/articles/1071813/wireless-co-ubiquiti-says-rival-sells-hacking-firmware
              > 
              >         I'd like to see more of the claims.
              > 
              >         They've also sued Sakid Ahmed and Dmitry Moiseev of 
Cambium.
              >         They've sued WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES, CORP.​.
              > 
              >         They've sued BLIP Networks​, a WISP in southern 
Illinois.
              > 
              > 
              > 
              >         -----
              >         Mike Hammett
              >         Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
              >         
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
              >         Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
              >         
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
              >         The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
              >         <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
              > 
              > 
              >         
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
              > 
              >     -- 
              >     AF mailing list
              >     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
              >     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
              > 
              > 
              > 

              -- 
              AF mailing list
              AF@af.afmug.com
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





          -- 
          AF mailing list
          AF@af.afmug.com
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


        -- 
        AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



        -- 
        AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


      -- 
      AF mailing list
      AF@af.afmug.com
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to