Yeah, I know. And considering that it generally takes a pretty big storm to
take out a geostationary satellite signal, I imagine it won't be too big of
a problem... but I wouldn't be surprised if it did turn out to be a big
problem either.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:20 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. But after the clouds, geostationary still needs to go another 23,000
> miles. LEO only has to go a few hundred.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 6/1/2019 10:47 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Clouds are generally a lot lower than a couple hundred miles...
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 10:58 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe at geostationary distances, but these are only a few hundred miles
>> up.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 6/1/2019 8:56 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> > Don't those bands have significant attenuation issues with like...
>> > clouds?
>> >
>> > On 6/1/19 10:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>> >> According to Wikipedia, they will be on Ku, Ka, and V bands.
>> >>
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)
>> >>
>> >> bp
>> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>> >>
>> >> On 6/1/2019 7:46 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>> >>> Wonder what frequencies they will use?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites-phone-home-dimming.html
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
