Yeap VPLS is where is at…

VPLS tunnels to the towers, CORE routing + L2VPN to customers( Enterprise, 
Wholesale)




Gino Villarini
Founder/President
@gvillarini
t: 787.273.4143 Ext. 204
m:
[https://image.ibb.co/ctQ7jU/aeronet-logo.png]<http://www.aeronetpr.com/>       
[https://image.ibb.co/noQeyp/inc500.png] <https://www.inc.com/profile/aeronet>  
[https://image.ibb.co/e4pBB9/fb-logo.png] <https://www.facebook.com/aeronetpr/> 
        [https://image.ibb.co/nxuuW9/insta-logo.png] 
<https://www.instagram.com/aeronetpr/?hl=en>       
[https://image.ibb.co/jhSEW9/in-logo.png] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp>     
[https://image.ibb.co/dqqq4U/tw-logo.png] 
<https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
        [https://image.ibb.co/bAJcjU/yt-logo.png] 
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA>
www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com> | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 
Guaynabo, PR 00968
From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MPLS

It seems like lots of people in the WISP-world are running MPLS just to use 
VPLS.  Reasons for doing this are typically to achieve better IPv4 utilization 
(not having to route a block of IP's to each POP and maybe wasting IPv4, etc).

Another common use-case is providing L2VPN services for customers (connecting 
multiple locations together, etc).

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:03 PM Adam Moffett 
<dmmoff...@gmail.com<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I think I don't fully understand what the advantages are of MPLS.

I mean I've been reading the white-papers and such, and I see it brings some 
features to the table, but when are we going to use them?

Routing speed:

 *   MPLS can make forwarding decisions faster.  When they made this in the 
1990's I'm sure that was a big deal, but I'm doubting whether there is really 
measurably better latency on modern hardware.  Is there?

Traffic Engineering:

 *   It can do redundancy, but it seems to rely on the routing protocol (eg 
OSPF) to know which paths are up.  I don't understand what that buys us.
 *   It can do load sharing on unequal paths.  Admittedly that's very hard to 
do with L3 routing protocols, and that would have been extremely useful at one 
point in time.  But how often does that happen now that we're in a world of 
gigabit and 10gigabit connections?
L2 tunneling

 *   It can transport L2 traffic over an L3 network.  It does it with less 
overhead (8 bytes) than any other method I can think of.  I don't really see a 
downside to this.
So are people running MPLS just to get VPLS tunnels, or do you find that the 
other tools in the MPLS toolbox matter in today's world?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to