Yes sir. We do it with others running 3.65 Huawei LTE. Works great. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:11 AM Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to sync Cambium with LTE gear? > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:36 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> There's also advantage to coexistence groups, though as I understand it, >> that's a SAS value add and not a requirement. >> >> As I understand it, a group of operators could form a co-existence group >> to ignore each other when determining availability. This would be used when >> a group of operators agreed to the same timing, uplink\downlink, etc. >> settings so that they didn't interfere with each other... like how >> GPS-based operators coexist today. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Sent: *Friday, February 21, 2020 12:31:28 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >> >> people worry about the contiguous block issue too much. The longest you >> would go with a non contiguous grant is a day. When the sas get jiggy with >> each other at night the channels will be redistributed in contiguous blocks. >> >> Getting 4 channels for a 40mhz will happen for a period, but man is that >> a bad business decision for the long term unless there is zero competition >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:34 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> The answer is a bit complicated, for example I suspect the SAS could >>> give you a grant, but not at the full xmt power a 450m is capable of, so >>> your range and modulation is reduced. >>> >>> >>> >>> Probably nobody knows the answer. A few WISPs who participated in ICD >>> might have some idea. But if you are asking can you count on getting 80 >>> MHz out of a total 150 MHz, and also as 2 contiguous blocks, I think we >>> know the answer. Even if it happened initially, that seems unlikely long >>> term. >>> >>> >>> >>> Much advertising hype in our business is based on “could it happen” >>> rather than “can we count on it”. That works with 5G because they are >>> talking about everybody getting gigabit speeds but if everybody only gets >>> 1/10 of that it’s still pretty damn fast. Not sure the same applies if you >>> talk about everybody getting 100 meg but most of the time it’s more like 10 >>> meg. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *castarritt . >>> *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2020 9:11 AM >>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >>> >>> >>> >>> The other important question is if we can count on getting a >>> contiguous 40mhz channel from the SAS, much less two of them to run a full >>> cluster of 450m in ABAB. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:59 AM Matt Mangriotis via AF <af@af.afmug.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Using 450i or 450b on the SM (client) side, a real world aggregate speed >>> test can be as high as 250 Mbps. If you have cnMeudsa (450m AP) for the >>> sector, you can achieve >750 Mbps (theoretically up to 1 Gbps, but I would >>> be lying to tell you I have ever seen this kind of efficiency in the real >>> world) sector capacity due to the Multi-User MIMO capabilities (i.e. >>> simultaneous transmissions to up to 4 clients in the same time slot). >>> >>> >>> >>> Running under Part 90 or Part 96 does not affect the system performance >>> (provided the channel size is the same, of course). >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz via AF >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2020 6:31 PM >>> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com> >>> *Cc:* Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> >>> *Subject:* [ External ] [AFMUG] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >>> >>> >>> >>> What is the real world expected station performance in a TCP speedtest >>> running a 40Mhz channel with a 450m running the CBRS software? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com >>> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unwiredltd.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7C754d6b42c39f4416aded08d7b6657af6%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637178419289348066&sdata=OPw7empnbwc2kPgGzH90j1T5uzlyjAdoA6mlfONSX5g%3D&reserved=0> >>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
