the hit is on the 450 not the LTE though to sync? what kind of a performance hit is it?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:29 PM Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes sir. We do it with others running 3.65 Huawei LTE. Works great. > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:11 AM Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > >> Is it possible to sync Cambium with LTE gear? >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:36 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >>> There's also advantage to coexistence groups, though as I understand it, >>> that's a SAS value add and not a requirement. >>> >>> As I understand it, a group of operators could form a co-existence group >>> to ignore each other when determining availability. This would be used when >>> a group of operators agreed to the same timing, uplink\downlink, etc. >>> settings so that they didn't interfere with each other... like how >>> GPS-based operators coexist today. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> >>> *Sent: *Friday, February 21, 2020 12:31:28 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >>> >>> people worry about the contiguous block issue too much. The longest you >>> would go with a non contiguous grant is a day. When the sas get jiggy with >>> each other at night the channels will be redistributed in contiguous blocks. >>> >>> Getting 4 channels for a 40mhz will happen for a period, but man is that >>> a bad business decision for the long term unless there is zero competition >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:34 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The answer is a bit complicated, for example I suspect the SAS could >>>> give you a grant, but not at the full xmt power a 450m is capable of, so >>>> your range and modulation is reduced. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Probably nobody knows the answer. A few WISPs who participated in ICD >>>> might have some idea. But if you are asking can you count on getting 80 >>>> MHz out of a total 150 MHz, and also as 2 contiguous blocks, I think we >>>> know the answer. Even if it happened initially, that seems unlikely long >>>> term. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Much advertising hype in our business is based on “could it happen” >>>> rather than “can we count on it”. That works with 5G because they are >>>> talking about everybody getting gigabit speeds but if everybody only gets >>>> 1/10 of that it’s still pretty damn fast. Not sure the same applies if you >>>> talk about everybody getting 100 meg but most of the time it’s more like 10 >>>> meg. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *castarritt . >>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2020 9:11 AM >>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The other important question is if we can count on getting a >>>> contiguous 40mhz channel from the SAS, much less two of them to run a full >>>> cluster of 450m in ABAB. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:59 AM Matt Mangriotis via AF <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Using 450i or 450b on the SM (client) side, a real world aggregate >>>> speed test can be as high as 250 Mbps. If you have cnMeudsa (450m AP) for >>>> the sector, you can achieve >750 Mbps (theoretically up to 1 Gbps, but I >>>> would be lying to tell you I have ever seen this kind of efficiency in the >>>> real world) sector capacity due to the Multi-User MIMO capabilities (i.e. >>>> simultaneous transmissions to up to 4 clients in the same time slot). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Running under Part 90 or Part 96 does not affect the system performance >>>> (provided the channel size is the same, of course). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz via AF >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2020 6:31 PM >>>> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Cc:* Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> >>>> *Subject:* [ External ] [AFMUG] 450m in 3.5Ghz max STA performance >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the real world expected station performance in a TCP speedtest >>>> running a 40Mhz channel with a 450m running the CBRS software? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com >>>> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unwiredltd.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7C754d6b42c39f4416aded08d7b6657af6%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637178419289348066&sdata=OPw7empnbwc2kPgGzH90j1T5uzlyjAdoA6mlfONSX5g%3D&reserved=0> >>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
