can he "replace" an existing antenna with a different one?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:19 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> He can’t hang another antenna.
>
> *From:* Kurt Fankhauser
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 25, 2020 1:11 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF11 custom combiner
>
> Yeah your insertion loss is going to kill the performance of the link, why
> may I ask are you trying to do this other than the obvious reason of not
> wanting to hang 2 antennas. Why not just get a more efficient radio for the
> link like Aviat? We just bough our first aviat link to replace an AF11 link
> this week.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:07 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that I think about it, this will not work without sharp bandpass
>> filters
>> on the transmitters.
>> To do what I have drawn here without the filters you would need a hybrid
>> combiner on the TX and you will lose another 3 dB in that.
>>
>> So 6 dB loss over all from one end to the other.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ch...@wbmfg.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 1:00 PM
>> To: Nate Burke ; af@af.afmug.com
>> Subject: AF11 custom combiner
>>
>> Nate, I am posting this to the list too.  Want to see if I made a mistake
>> here.  I don't have a ton of experience with the internals of the AF11.
>> I think each diplexer feeds a TX and an RX right?
>> Not sure how good the RX input filters are.  So I used a splitter rather
>> than circulators.
>>
>> Circulators would have less loss but you have to have a pretty sharp
>> bandpass filter on the front of the receivers to do that trick.
>> You could add the filters.
>>
>> Not sure this will work without TX filters too but I think it will.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nate Burke
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 11:15 AM
>> To: ch...@wbmfg.com
>> Subject: Re: Re: AF11 custom combiner
>>
>> Both paths are dual polarity v/h
>> SiteA
>> Radio1 TX 11505
>> Radio2 TX 11225
>>
>> SiteB
>> Radio1 TX 11015
>> Radio2 TX 10735
>>
>> Those are different Diplexers on the AF11 Radios  11015x11505 is the
>> high diplexer  11225x10735 is the low diplexer.  If they were just
>> single pol licenses, I'm already doing that with 2 radios on 1 AF11
>> dish, one radio on V one radio on H.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nate
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/2020 12:07 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>> > 10735 is pretty close to 11015.  Would these be tx frequencies?
>> > Need to know what is RX and what is TX at this site.  Also what is on
>> what
>> > polarization.
>> > -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke Sent: Wednesday, March 25,
>> > 2020 10:55 AM To: ch...@wbmfg.com Subject: Re: AF11 custom combiner
>> > The boss is asking the questions, and in his mind it should be as simple
>> > as wire-nutting the 3 coax's together.  So I have to follow up with why
>> > that won't work and present a solution for him.
>> >
>> > Channels we have are
>> > 11505x11015 (high)
>> > 11225x10735 (low)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Nate
>> >
>> > On 3/25/2020 11:10 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>> >> Yes, you can do that and it is lossy.
>> >> Circulators and splitters are frequently used.
>> >> Being high/low licenses makes things a bit more difficult.
>> >>
>> >> If you can give me details as to what radios and frequencies you want
>> to
>> >> put on the AF11 dish I can think on it a bit.
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 9:44 AM
>> >> To: Chuck McCown
>> >> Subject: AF11 custom combiner
>> >>
>> >> Chuck, We've been using your AF11 REMEC adapters in a couple places.  I
>> >> have a location where I can't physically add another Dish, but I do
>> have
>> >> 2 licensed channels to the site.  1 high band and 1 low band. Is there
>> >> a way to combine 2 dual band radios onto the same dish?  I already have
>> >> the AF11 dish installed, so if there was just a way to do a
>> >> splitter/combiner with the N Connectors, that would be ideal.  I didn't
>> >> know if such a beast existed, or if it was something in your
>> >> engineering/production toolbag, or if it's technically impossible.
>> >> Maybe using the Coax would be too much loss, and the only way to do it
>> >> would be with a feedhorn combiner, and the remec adapters.  I thought
>> >> this might be something that you would just know off the top of your
>> >> head.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Nate Burke
>> >> Blast Communications
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to