We are moving a couple APs to this new band and then using the “abandoned” channel to widen other APs to 30 or 40mhz. If/when we need to go back we just reverse the process, it’s all just software changes. By the time we have to revert I’d hope everyone is back at work and bandwidth demand goes back to normal levels.
-Sean On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> wrote: > That is why we haven’t pursued it. Making the change for what could be > 60 days only doesn’t seem worth the hassle. Especially when you vacate > channels that are working for you now. If it is likely we’ll have to move > back into the 5 GHz normal channels, we dare not vacate them. I think > we’d be pretty interested if there was a good chance we wouldn’t have to > move back. > > > > Regards, > > > > David Coudron > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:00 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > If only someone knew the answers to these questions....................... > > > > *From:* Mathew Howard > > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:44 PM > > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > I would think you'd still want to work on other options for long term > capacity, but it would certainly be nice way to get some quick capacity > increases with little or no tower work. > > I'm wondering how hard it is to get in on this... > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:19 PM Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> > wrote: > > My concern is after the 60 days, I have to move all those APs back to the > original congested 5GHz space. > > Is it worth it the time/trouble? If I move off of a channel for 60 days, > maybe someone else in the vicinity might start using it since it’s clearer > now? > > > > > > On Mar 31, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Matt Hoppes < > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > > > > Correct it is 60 days only at this point, with the possibility to renew it > should this continue . > > > On Mar 31, 2020, at 3:00 PM, David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> > wrote: > > The initial STA is only for 60 days as I understand it. From what I have > read, it doesn’t look to be permanent. > > > > Regards, > > > > David Coudron > > > > > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM > *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > How permanent is this likely to be? > > One could think all of the manufacturers could roll out the software > without much effort. > > But perhaps part 15 testing would have to be done before they can sell > them? > > > > *From:* SmarterBroadband > > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 12:54 PM > > *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' > > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to > increase bandwidth during the Covid crisis. > > > > What gear will support this? 450? ePMP? > > > > Adam > ------------------------------ > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > ------------------------------ > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
