Seems to match up with what we are seeing.   Ohio’s number is high but likely 
skewed down by the SE Appalachia area of the state where availability is still 
poor.

Mark

> On Apr 16, 2020, at 7:58 PM, Brian Webster <i...@wirelessmapping.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Data from 2017 by state.
>  
> https://www.statista.com/chart/10600/us-home-broadband-penetration-by-state/
>  
>  
> Thank you,
> Brian Webster
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>  
> From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brian Webster
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 7:04 PM
> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Market saturation
>  
> That’s within the range I would expect based on a mature broadband market. 
> They say it takes at least 2 years to hit a good market penetration rate.
>  
> Thank you,
> Brian Webster
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>  
> From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chris Fabien
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:19 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Market saturation
>  
> In our rural areas, with FTTH on a road for several years, we usually get no 
> higher than 75%.
>  
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 12:30 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What percentage of rural customers would you all consider saturated?
>  
> I have access to some new datasets and it disturbing. It's good disturbing, 
> but unanticipated. 
>  
> May be bad.
>  
> Is there a rural percentage of capture that is considered saturated as a 
> standard? 100 percent is what we all want. But there are customers who dont 
> want, or simply cannot afford internet access. There has to be some numbers 
> out there.
>  
> I doubt government numbers count, since government is dumb. Where does a 
> simpleton such as myself go to find out what is considered saturated?
>  
> Say I touch 1000 households. What is the percentage of capture that marketing 
> is no longer recommended? If I have 500 of them, I'd think that's pretty 
> good, maybe even saturated between lack of need, want, or ability and offset 
> by whatever percentage per terrain would be co sided unservicable. I'd assume 
> my midwest flatlands unservicable would be different than Johnny paychecks 
> Arkansas hills unservicable.
>  
> These numbers have to be somewhere
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to