In the interest of accuracy and sound scientific methods, best to stick 3 meat thermometers into different organs. Too much chance of inconsistent results if you're checking subjects with liver failure. A three pronged test will definitely give better results.
From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:09 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Thermal camera for screening folks with fever not worth the risk, best to just shoot everybody as they come in, stick a meat thermometer in their liver. We need accurate results to stop the spread On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:48 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com<mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote: I heard on one of the podcasts I listen to that the generic thermal cameras are not useful for fever screening. Better to just use a non-touch forehead (AKA temporal) thermometer. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 5/21/2020 1:12 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: We are looking into some thermal camera solutions for screening folks at one of the places I do IT and camera work for with lots of traffic. They have some handheld ones as well. The handheld basic model is 1200 my cost... WiFi versions are a bit more. This one in picture is about 2500.00 -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ________________________________ Total Control Panel Login<https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net> To: ja...@litewire.net<https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net> From: af-boun...@af.afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> You received this message because the domain afmug.com is on your allow list.
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
