The rules are different in every state. I bet it drives those national
companies crazy or costs them a load to keep up with the rules in software.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:28 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Every state is different, and many states have already gone off the end of
> unemployment. Add to that, that a lot of people couldn't get unemployment
> and/or are still waiting for their first check. I don't commit the
> different state unemployment rules to memory, but some states (Missouri?
> Florida?) have very short duration for unemployment, and their
> weekly/monthly payment rate is way below that.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 8/6/2020 8:18 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>
> Still taxed or not, that is a very sweet deal in my opinion.  You could
> save up enough to not work for several years at that rate.  This assumes
> you live in a van down by the river and eat ramen at every meal.
>
> *From:* Carl Peterson
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:15 AM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Political and I should probably not post this
>
> I just skimmed it but I think the TLDR on it is that since UI varies by
> state etc you can compare return to work rates for people making more and
> less then they used to and it seems they return to work at similar rates.
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:10 AM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Pretty sure unemployment is taxed like ordinary income at the federal
>> level.  State by state varies.  I think your numbers are assuming it isn't
>> taxed?
>>
>> Yale did a study on this.
>>
>> CARES-UI_identification_vF(1).pdf
>> (2,000K)
>>
>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=65db33fe01&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-a:r4257579253290864261&view=att&disp=safe&realattid=f_kdixrue20>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:59 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But at the risk of starting another brush fire...  but I want to know:
>>>
>>> People laid of in Utah get unemployment benefits.  I work hard to
>>> prevent those getting charged to me.  But I know that the rates paid are
>>> $496/week max.  That is Utah.
>>> So $12.40/hour take home.  Equivalent to much more gross.  Probably in
>>> the $17/hour range gross.
>>>
>>> Then if I understand it right, the feds were adding $600/week on top of
>>> that?  $1096/week?  $56,992 annual rate.  Take home.  Equivalent to perhaps
>>> $80K gross?
>>>
>>> So a laid off bartender gets the equivalent of $40/hour to sit at home,
>>> why would they want to work?  The press and libs in congress have been
>>> freaking out about the conservatives saying the fat benefit package is an
>>> incentive to not try to work.  I believe that to be true.  Why would anyone
>>> work if they get that much for drinking beer and playing video games?
>>>
>>> Do I have this right?  Does the fed benefit add to the state benefit?
>>>
>>> I have a son that lived on $1000/month for years while in college.  He
>>> said he didn’t feel the pinch too much.  Had roommates.  Had a part time
>>> job.  Never asked me for money.
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to