Sometimes we just can’t help ourselves... From: Brian Webster Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 9:13 AM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal
Isn’t it Lent? Thank you, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 11:00 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal Well, pedophilia amongst children is probably OK. Moderate shootings with bean bag projectiles can be OK. Moderate cannibalism is OK when your airplane crashes in the Andes or you get snowed in by Truckee. Moderate fascism is totally OK in Russia it appears. I like moderate black lives. From: Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 8:49 AM To: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal Only moderate fascism. Only moderate pedophilia. Only moderate cannibalism. Only moderate shooting. Only moderate black lives. bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 10/7/2020 6:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: I choose moderation in all things. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: The medal hanging in the center of Star Trek Q's chest appears to be a sheep. Oddly relevant. The shepherd known as QAnon convinces his sheep that they're the enlightened ones and the non-believers are the real sheep. I know some of you are more worried about the left wing radicals who need to battle fascism and white supremacists which actually exist in the US only in scattered hundreds with no political or cultural relevance. The right wing ones frighten the hell out of me with their need to battle the pedophile cannibals who are completely imaginary. A lot of people on both of these wings imagine that the silent majority secretly supports them. I think the silent majority is silent for the same reason you silently ignore a raving street preacher. Meanwhile a lot of politicians have noted that the loud and crazy people are more motivated to vote. Actual policy discussion becomes mired in the craziness. "Oh you like free markets? Must be a white supremacist." "Oh you're concerned the American police resort to violence more often than those in other countries. You're a pawn of the pedophile cannibal cabal." Interesting times. On 10/6/2020 6:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: <qheader.jpg> ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bill Prince" mailto:part15...@gmail.com To: af@af.afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:23:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal Q is the supposed "leader" of Qanon. Personally, I think there is probably more than one Q, and they may or may not coordinate their message(s). I think they could be more effective if they weren't so out and out bonkers. Eat babies? really? bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 10/6/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Jones wrote: is that a real conspiracy? My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great deal of private property rights including waiving otard stuff On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use their browser and the volume isn't turned off. On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: Messaging is king of all I suppose. If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give it away for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of robbery or graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public relations coup. On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic. You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it or not. They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider something else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider another option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're willing to pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost. .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors will cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't do the same thing if they could. On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees. They can have any service provider they want. But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated area. I would bet they will not do it. From: Mark Radabaugh Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/ https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts Pay your money and take your chances Mark On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the CATV level years ago and was found legal. On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and investment? Mark On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross. So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of these deals? -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -------------------------------------------------------------- -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
