Moderate Lent
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:14 AM Brian Webster <i...@wirelessmapping.com> wrote: > Isn’t it Lent? > > > > Thank you, > > Brian Webster > > www.wirelessmapping.com > > > > *From:* AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2020 11:00 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > > > Well, pedophilia amongst children is probably OK. > > Moderate shootings with bean bag projectiles can be OK. > > Moderate cannibalism is OK when your airplane crashes in the Andes or you > get snowed in by Truckee. > > Moderate fascism is totally OK in Russia it appears. > > I like moderate black lives. > > > > *From:* Bill Prince > > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2020 8:49 AM > > *To:* af@af.afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > > > Only moderate fascism. > > Only moderate pedophilia. > > Only moderate cannibalism. > > Only moderate shooting. > > Only moderate black lives. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 10/7/2020 6:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > I choose moderation in all things. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > The medal hanging in the center of Star Trek Q's chest appears to be a > sheep. Oddly relevant. The shepherd known as QAnon convinces his sheep > that they're the enlightened ones and the non-believers are the real > sheep. > > > > I know some of you are more worried about the left wing radicals who need > to battle fascism and white supremacists which actually exist in the US > only in scattered hundreds with no political or cultural relevance. The > right wing ones frighten the hell out of me with their need to battle the > pedophile cannibals who are completely imaginary. A lot of people on both > of these wings imagine that the silent majority secretly supports them. I > think the silent majority is silent for the same reason you silently ignore > a raving street preacher. Meanwhile a lot of politicians have noted that > the loud and crazy people are more motivated to vote. > > > > Actual policy discussion becomes mired in the craziness. "Oh you like > free markets? Must be a white supremacist." > > "Oh you're concerned the American police resort to violence more often > than those in other countries. You're a pawn of the pedophile cannibal > cabal." Interesting times. > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2020 6:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > <qheader.jpg> > > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Bill Prince" mailto:part15...@gmail.com > *To: *af@af.afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:23:18 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > Q is the supposed "leader" of Qanon. Personally, I think there is probably > more than one Q, and they may or may not coordinate their message(s). I > think they could be more effective if they weren't so out and out bonkers. > Eat babies? really? > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 10/6/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > is that a real conspiracy? > > > > My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q > believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always > thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the > administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just > had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for > little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit > > > > I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry > into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id > put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great > deal of private property rights including waiving otard stuff > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: > > Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use their > browser and the volume isn't turned off. > > On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Messaging is king of all I suppose. > > If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give it away > for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of robbery or > graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public relations > coup. > > > > On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic. > > You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy > anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it > or not. They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider > something else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider > another option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're > willing to pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost. > > .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors will > cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean > they wouldn't do the same thing if they could. > > > > On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: > > > > We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees. > They can have any service provider they want. > > But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated > area. I would bet they will not do it. > > > > *From:* Mark Radabaugh > > *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM > > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > > > > https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/ > > https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 > > FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February > ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts > <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjak-670p7sAhUVHM0KHcR5D74QFjACegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoalawblog.com%2Ffcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IWC6vbyFt33Un5wLgPWSa> > > > > Pay your money and take your chances > > > > Mark > > > > On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > > > Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be > illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they > want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the > CATV level years ago and was found legal. > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > > I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an > FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that > sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and > investment? > > > > Mark > > > > On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: > > > > I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to > come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA > fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross. > So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am > wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of > these deals? > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
