Alito disagrees with you and cites the case law.
Without stating it, he got his tone through on the likely outcome.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 11:35 AM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
wrote:
> Declining to hear the case because, in the opinion of this court, Texas
> does not have standing, is case law. The court can't decide to hear the
> case in order to decide that they shouldn't have decided to hear the case.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:56 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That's exactly why the supreme court needed to do their job and hear it.
>> Then smack it down, I don't like the supreme court making decisions out of
>> political expedience as they did here (hint the last 3). Hell, these arent
>> even states actually at each other, its elected state officials. Scotus
>> needed to put case law with a ruling (this wasnt a ruling) in the books.
>>
>> There will be violence that could have been avoided. Outcome of the
>> "case" would have been the same either way.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 7:24 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There's a school of thought that since their jurisdiction is exclusive,
>>> the Supreme Court has an obligation to hear *any* case a state brings
>>> no matter how flawed it might be. Their feeling is that since there's no
>>> higher power to appeal to, that they *have *to hear the case so that it
>>> gets heard. Thomas and Alito are in that school of thought, and that's why
>>> they expressed the opinion they did.
>>>
>>> My reading of it is that the only disagreement was whether to tell Texas
>>> to go away before or after they're allowed to file their complaints.
>>> Either way, the court unanimously told Texas to pound sand. The only way
>>> this is unclear is if someone willfully interprets it that way. If someone
>>> is inclined it interpret it that way, then they would have been unhappy
>>> with any outcome. There was absolutely zero chance that the Supreme Court
>>> of the US would overturn one state's election at the behest of another.
>>> Especially based on the argument that "their election processes hurt us."
>>> If they did that, then similar suits would happen every 4 years henceforth.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2020 10:31 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> We need to have scotus do their damn job and get case law. If they keep
>>> punting for politics it will get stupid. This team when one snaps out you
>>> dont get some cross dresser popping through a crowd to bike lock someone
>>> and scurrying off, you get Oklahoma city. They need to shut the shit down
>>> or pay the cost of the product they purchased.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, 6:24 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Deep within this troll, the force runs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2020 4:10 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know what was more bizarre, that music video, or Chuck being
>>>> the one who sent it. Who knew.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2020 5:55 PM
>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>>
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2020 2:55 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there a mind blown emoji?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of
>>>> Chuck McCown via AF
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 4:30 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com> <ch...@go-mtc.com>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/yModCU1OVHY
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> From: Bill Prince
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 3:28 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First place I heard it was from Molly Wood on Make Me Smart:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en
>>>>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>>
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2020 12:03 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was not familiar with the term banana-pants. A Google search yields
>>>>
>>>> lots of results, mostly photos of banana pants, as well as some songs,
>>>>
>>>> none of which shed much light on the subject for me. I assume it
>>>>
>>>> means cra-cra?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of
>>>> Robert Andrews
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 1:42 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This was similar to how the south leaders hauled all the regular
>>>>
>>>> people into the civil war. Yes they did a good job stirring things up
>>>>
>>>> before.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2020 11:19 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The people who should really be looking at this are the citizens in
>>>>
>>>> the states who think it's appropriate for their AG to sue another
>>>>
>>>> state's election results.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The suit was what I would call banana-pants.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>>
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2020 4:19 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you from the SCOTUS...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
