Yeah, I have no idea. It seems a little pointless to have to worry about
being within 3 feet for agl if you don't have an accurate ground level. I
wonder how accurate you can actually get with ground levels, and what the
most accurate method for determining it is.

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:52 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> we use a trupulse for agl, but even with agl being accurate at that slice
> in time, is the ground level accurate?
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:35 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I always figured that using Google Earth for lat/lon and ground elevation
>> is as accurate as I'm going to realistically get with any method that's
>> available to me (yeah, I suppose I could pay a surveyor to go out there and
>> get me better numbers, but that's not really going to happen). As long as I
>> check a few points around the area and don't find any drastic (unexpected)
>> differences in elevation, I figure it's pretty accurate.
>>
>> Making a mistake in mounting height on the tower seems like a bigger
>> concern to me... on smaller towers, I should be able to get within a few
>> inches by counting tower sections, or even dropping a tape measure, but if
>> you're up a few hundred feet, that can get a lot trickier.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:07 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> IANAL but if I wanted to do an audit, I’d just check against Google
>>> Earth for lat/lon and ground elevation.  That’s close enough nobody will
>>> care about the difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For azimuth, if you have the lat/lon of each end, you can calculate
>>> azimuth, assuming the antennas were aligned properly.  If the RSSI is
>>> within a few dB of target, they were aligned properly.  You can find
>>> azimuth by drawing a line on Google Earth, or using something like
>>> LinkPlanner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’d mostly be worried about xmt freq, channel width, and xmt power
>>> matching the license.  It would be easy to miss the fact that frequency
>>> coordination showed you needed to dial back the xmt power, or to make a
>>> mistake and be on the wrong frequency.  Those would be bad errors.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tougher one to audit would be AGL.  You coordinate the link, apply for
>>> your license, then tell the tower guys to mount the dish at 100 feet.  But
>>> how do they determine 100 feet?  Count tower sections?  Foot markers on
>>> cable?  Tape drop?  Laser rangefinder?  Maybe there’s a beacon light at the
>>> 100 feet so they put it at 90 or 110.  Or there’s a nice abandoned mount at
>>> 120 feet so they put it there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 28, 2020 11:44 AM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hypothetical, If FCC was coming I would be freaking out. I just spend a
>>> lot of time nervous about all our licensed links and one day finding out we
>>> are just outside the margin, particularly on amsl. We use the smart
>>> aligner now to verify the coordinate, but I assume FCC has more accurate
>>> meter than me. Or I'm completely off and FCC equates to whoever FCC
>>> contract to come.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I can look at tolerance charts all day, but If I dont know what the
>>> tolerance is measured against, what value is it. Like if I want to get
>>> super accurate on weights I can go steal one of the ones in the jars and
>>> compare it to my weights
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:02 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> When I had our frequency coordinator do an FAA application for us
>>> (licensed link on tower near airport) and mentioned the discussion here
>>> about 2C surveys, they acted like I was crazy.  Are you sure this is
>>> required?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve, is this hypothetical, or is the FCC paying you a visit?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know one time I discovered the commercial tower we were on had the
>>> lat/lon wrong on the ASR.  For us to fix out license, they had to also fix
>>> the ASR.  It was just a matter of filing a modification.  I also seem to
>>> remember something about it wasn’t significant unless it was off by at
>>> least 1 second or something.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Honestly I just use the numbers from my Garmin 64st, same as for CPI
>>> data for CBRS.  Given several minutes it will usually state accuracy within
>>> <10 feet.  I check it against Google Earth and they usually match to better
>>> than that.  Even the elevation AMSL usually matches.  If there was a need
>>> for a survey I would think it would have to be for AMSL, there’s just no
>>> rational reason to need a surveyor to certify the lat/lon these days.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 28, 2020 10:41 AM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC coordinate verification
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> im asking about if you get nailed by the FCC, not application
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM Cameron Crum <cc...@murcevilo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Typically if you are filing for FAA or FCC you have to supply
>>> coordinates from a 2C survey mimium. They assume a certified survey is good
>>> enough.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:02 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have any of you guys ever had the FCC verify your transmitter data?
>>>
>>> What equipment do they use to verify elevation and coordinate?
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to