theyre building it now
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/28/worlds-largest-nuclear-fusion-project-under-assembly-in-france
i read this a while back and was like "whatchu talkin bout willis". I
really thought we were way away, not building it

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:52 AM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com>
wrote:

> I have heard of break even fusion within the next 30 years for the past 50
> years.
>
> *From:* Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Monday, July 12, 2021 10:38 AM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** OT interesting graphic
>
> Im all about these new generation reactors that use the spent fuel from
> prior generation reactors. people get too scared of nuclear waste because
> of movies and CNN.
> Apparently theres a massive fusion reactor that is being built, I thought
> that was still all theoretical.
> Almost everyone around our landfill has developed some form of cancer or
> another. But we also have a ton of undocumented abandoned coal mines under
> us that were used as garbage dumps. I dont know how a statistician could
> identify whether its the landfill, the coalmine, the garbage in the coal
> mines, or the chemtrails that caused it.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 9:48 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The USA used to burn about a billion tons of coal per year.  Now down to
>> about a half billion tons.
>>
>> About 10-12% of that tonnage is left behind as ash and slag which then go
>> into a landfill.  That waste is slightly radioactive and contains a variety
>> of metals which were incidentally mined along with the coal (mercury,
>> cadmium, arsenic, among others).  The clay lining of the landfill doesn't
>> last forever....they all end up leaking some.
>>
>> That doesn't count the waste produced from mining, crushing, and washing
>> the coal.  All of which produce toxic waste which also goes into a landfill.
>>
>> People fuss and wring their hands that we don't have a *perfect *way to
>> handle nuclear waste, but nobody seems overly bothered that we don't have a
>> perfect way to handle the coal waste that we've already been making for 200
>> years.
>>
>> You're not particularly likely to be harmed by either properly handled
>> coal or fission waste, the coal waste is the more likely one to impact you:
>>
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/
>>
>> And air pollution from fission is almost non-existent.  We keep waiting
>> for the perfect energy solution instead of adopting the dramatically better
>> one that we already have available.  We're pretty irrational about this
>> whole topic IMO.
>>
>>
>> On 7/9/2021 4:22 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>>
>> Pretty sure coal mining accidents plus black lung add up to more than
>> anything else on the chart.
>> Coal fly ash is more radioactive than any other radioactive thing
>> released as far as curies released.
>>
>> Not sure how you calculate air pollution.  Also not sure how you quantify
>> ultimate deaths from Chernobyl.  Those numbers range from the 31 people
>> that actually died at the time to 50 ultimate deaths.  But other calculate
>> it as high as 900,000  Most of the firefighters and other responders are
>> either still living or lived a natural lifespan.
>>
>> Still nuclear doesn’t touch coal.
>>
>>
>> https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/could-small-amounts-of-radiation-be-good-for-you-its-complicated
>>
>> My favorite story is the apartment building in Taiwan that was
>> constructed using radioactive rebar.
>> People bathed by high radiation for years had only 3% of the expected
>> cancer.
>>
>>
>> https://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2020/12/the-curious-case-of-radioactive-apartments/
>>
>> *From:* can...@believewireless.net
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 9, 2021 2:02 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** OT interesting graphic
>>
>> I'd rather see the deaths by accident alone. "Air pollution" seems like
>> it could be a fuzzy number.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:19 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [image: nuclear-10adesktop-2]
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to