A brake related topic that has some level of value here is people who tow cars with their RV's.   Some follow the law and get a braking system for the towed vehicle.   It's kinda common sense ( besides the law in all states ).   Some say "Hey my RV stops fine without it"  Until it doesn't or the towed vehicle breaks away from the RV and takes out a bunch of other cars/people.

i.e.   It's not about you and what risks there are to you.   It's about the risks to others.

On 7/23/21 2:10 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:


Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

*From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com>
*Date:* July 23, 2021 at 2:40:46 PM MDT
*To:* David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com>
*Subject:* *Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political*

 You really think the FDA approval has that much value?  When time is of the essence and we discover cutting your arm off if you sprout horns will keep you from infecting others we will all be carrying machetes while waiting on the FDA.  They are not geared for emergencies like this.  Their emergency approval is plenty good enough for me.

And allowing you on the freeway without having brakes is tantamount to giving machine guns to monkeys.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 23, 2021, at 2:32 PM, David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> wrote:



Chuck,

If you were at the base of a mountain with lava flowing down it, you’d drive that car with no brakes.   It is a risk/reward situation.    I do know some folks personally that have health situations that wouldn’t risk taking something until it has full FDA approval.   Not sure why that is so weird.   Unfortunately this topic is so explosive you can’t have a good discussion without the “they should all be in jail” type of comment.   If it was in jest, as many comments in this list are, that would be fine.   Everyone needs to have a sense of humor.   I don’t believe that it is.

I think you can probably take me off the list going forward.   We don’t seem to hit technical topics that often, and while I enjoy so many of the folks on the list, I am finding more and more often the topics are too devoid of substantive argument.

Thanks,

*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Chuck McCown via AF
*Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 3:19 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
*Cc:* Chuck McCown <ch...@go-mtc.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

This is not like choosing to not wear a seatbelt.  This is like choosing to drive without brakes.

Sent from my iPhone



    On Jul 23, 2021, at 2:11 PM, David Coudron
    <david.coud...@advantenon.com
    <mailto:david.coud...@advantenon.com>> wrote:

    

    I know, we can all make our own decisions.   However, I don’t
    believe I have stated anything that varies from the facts.   I
    can send you the Moderna sheet I received with my vaccine if you
    want to see that.

    Your points about FDA approval are probably accurate, however,
    why is not OK to say that I want to wait for the approval?  
    That doesn’t seem so unreasonable. We don’t let folks on the
    plane based on the likelihood that those on the no-fly list
    probably won’t show up to get on the plane anyway.   We still
    check each and every person to make sure.  Just like we do the
    FDA approval process to make sure.   Otherwise, we could just
    tell drug companies “if you are pretty sure you’d pass anyway,
    we won’t bother putting you through the approval process”   We
    don’t do that for good reason.

    I agree with you on the memes both ways.   Neither approach are
    helping the situation.   It should be a discussion based upon
    the scientific merits of the situation. Unfortunately both side
    love to poke at the intelligence of those that don’t agree with
    their decision.

    There is no way to know this for sure, but I wonder how many
    folks publicly shaming others for not taking the vaccine know
    that it is not FDA approved?

    Likely won’t change lots of folks decisions, nor am I suggesting
    it should have.   But I don’t think that those of us that
    decided to go ahead with the vaccination get to make medical
    decisions for those who aren’t comfortable with an experimental
    vaccine.

    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
    <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
    *Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 2:56 PM
    *To:* af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political

    I'm not calling anybody stupid, but I don't agree with most of
    your list.

    On 7/23/2021 3:37 PM, David Coudron wrote:

        Here is what I find particularly challenging about
        suggesting that folks who have chosen not to take the
        vaccine are not that smart.

         1. Folks who do that never talk about that fact that this
            is not an FDA approved medicine/vaccine.   I took the
            Moderna vaccine, the paperwork clearly stated several
            facts.  Among them are:

             1. This is not FDA approved.

    It has an emergency use authorization.  FDA approval takes a
    long time, but around 90% of the submissions end up approved
    because they are pretty well tested by the manufacturer before
    they apply.  Anybody applying for FDA approval already has a
    pretty good idea whether it's going to go through or not. 
    Presumably people on a no-fly list don't routinely show up at
    the airport expecting to board a plane.  Presumably people don't
    try to get a CDL if they know they'll fail the drug test.  Same
    idea.


            2.
             3. This “vaccine” has not been proven to prevent the
                virus.   While we likely all agree that there is a
                very good likelihood that this “vaccine” will help
                prevent it, it is far from a proven fact.

    99% of people dying of Covid right now are un-vaccinated.  We
    can split hairs and say maybe it didn't prevent them from
    becoming infected, but it clearly prevents them from dying.


            4.

         2. The argument is, “there should be no reason to think
            this vaccine isn’t safe since people aren’t dying from
            taking the vaccine”.

    I've never heard such an argument.


         3.   Vaccines are a risk/reward type of medical
            treatment.   Every medicine you take has some level of
            side effect.   The vast majority of medicines have such
            negligible side effects, that they are considered
            completely safe.   The FDA approval process exists to
            ensure we understand the potential of serious side
            effects and drug interaction issues.   If you are 30
            years old and folks are saying you have to take this
            experimental drug to prevent this incredibly small
            chance of you becoming seriously ill or dying, it seems
            like an intelligent thing to say “I am not sure the risk
            of getting seriously ill or dying from this disease
            outweighs the risk of using an experimental drug”.   It
            used to be that people relied upon a conversation with
            their doctor to determine personal risk of disease and
            use of a drug.    Apparently we no longer do that.   We
            publicly shame people into using experimental drugs.




         4. Since it is not FDA approved, we don’t have a full
            understanding of drug interactions with other medicines
            folks need to take.

    It isn't some weird new chemical we just invented this year.



         5. We likely understand the very common medicines, but,
            certainly not all.   We have FDA approval processes for
            good reason.   If for example, you were under 40 and
            were taking seizure control medication, it would be very
            fair to hold off on an experimental drug until it is
            fully understood if the vaccine might lessen the
            effectiveness of the seizure control medication.   An
            incredibly low risk of serious illness or death from the
            virus could turn into a good chance of serious injury
            from seizure.   As far as I know data like that is
            certainly not available yet.




         6. Why do vaccinated people feel the need to belittle those
            that have decided not to get vaccinated by an
            experimental drug?

    I don't know the answer to that.  I'm not comfortable with that
    behavior either.  It goes both ways though.  Plenty of memes out
    there accusing people of being dumb sheep for taking the vaccine.

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>



-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to