For some reason, that's not working either.
Got the PTP650 on ether9 on the MT. Ether9 gets IP 169.254.1.3/16.
I created a reachable address on the local interface (192.168.222.199).
Then I added the dst-nat:
/ip firewall nat add chain=dstnat action=dst-nat
dst-address=192.168.222.199 to-address=169.254.1.1
I ping the 192.168.222.199 address from a PC on the local network, but
nothing happens. Torching the port on the MT shows nothing happening on
any IP on that port (except discovery).
bp
On 9/23/2014 10:18 AM, Paul Conlin via Af wrote:
OMG Bill. You *have* to learn how to DST-NAT. Great for programming
Canopy radios and best get-me-out-of-this-jam rescue trick EVVVER.
Access any device on any MT router anywhere---even when not routable.
No VPN required. No need for Telnet tunneling.
First put the SM on a MT interface and assign 169.254.1.2/16
Two variants to pick from:
Add a new [reachable_address] on the MT that you don't need for
anything else then:
/ip fire nat add chain=dstnat action=dst-nat
dst-address=[reachable_address] to-address=169.254.1.1
Then http://[reachable_address] to get to the SM
Or use an existing MT address and map from an unused port like this:
/ip fire nat add chain=dstnat action=dst-nat
dst-address=[reachable_address] dst-port=8169 to-address=169.254.1.1
to-port=80
Then http://[reachable_address]:8169 to get to the SM
PC
Blaze Broadband
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pconlin=blazebroadband....@afmug.com] On
Behalf
> Of Bill Prince via Af
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:44 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] routing to/from 169.254.0.0
>
> I think netmap will do what I need. I "think" I can netmap the
> 169.254.1.1 IP address to an unused IP on my local network. Not
sure how netmap
> actually works, but I'll give it a rip.
>
> bp
>
> On 9/23/2014 9:11 AM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:
> > Doesn't work if I change the MT address to 169.254.1.3/24 either.
> > Packets go out, but don't come back.
> >
> > bp
> >
> > On 9/23/2014 9:05 AM, Larry Smith via Af wrote:
> >> On Tue September 23 2014 10:58, Bill Prince via Af wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to route to/from a Cambium radio that is on the
> >>> default IP (169.254.1.1) through a Mikrotik? I think the issue is
> >>> that the default configuration does not have a gateway. So it
> >>> doesn't know the way back.
> >>>
> >>> I put the interface on the MT on 169.254.1.3/16, but don't get
> >>> replies unless I go directly from the MT.
> >> Believe the Cambium default is 169.254.1.1/24 (255.255.255.0 netmask)
> >> and your /16 (255.255.0.0) is broadcasting on the wrong address for
> >> the radio to "see" you.
> >>
> >
> >