I believe the CMMmicro (CMM3) was the only CMM that contained hub/switches.
Everything else was passthrough.

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

>   If I am not mistaken, the original CMM had a hub.
>
>  *From:* Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 10:16 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question
>
>  My issue with the CMM-type products is they're all switched, correct? I
> want no layer two devices between my radio and my router.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Adam Moffett via Af" <af@afmug.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:54:45 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question
>
>
> .....also the PMP100 SyncInjector from Packetflux ought to work with
> ePMP.  You might want the gigE version, but in the real world with a mix of
> subscribers at different MCS levels I'm not sure how likely you are to
> exceed 100x100.
>
> The CMM4 is a much more rugged beast.  It is expensive, but you are not
> likely to go back and wish you'd bought the cheap one.
>
> My plan is to hook up the internal GPS and have it available, but also to
> provide sync over power.  Once you are using GPS sync to re-use channels it
> becomes critical that it's always working, so better to have two timing
> sources available IMO.
>
>  They have built in GPS if youre on a budget, not sure why alot of people
> are so die hard against using it
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Grip via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
>>  I’m looking at ePMP w/channel reuse from a cost-comparison standpoint.
>> Trying to figure out how much I need to spend on GPS synch for a 4 AP/ 2
>> channel cluster. Does it need to be a CMM4? I will want to be synching
>> multiple POPs…
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeremy Grip
>> North Branch Networks,LLC
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to