Rory, Can you define "better filtering" from a practical perspective?
What frequency have you compared, 450 to ePMP? With interference or something? The reason I ask that is we are taking down 2.4 PMP100 and replacing a lot of those with ePMP, which is working well except where we have a 2.4 competitor, which has proved most challenging. Is there anybody that has tried both ePMP in 2.4 and 450 in 2.4 side by side (not at the same time of course) in that type of interference environment and found that ePMP performed worse ? Paul -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway via Af Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 12:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 in 5.1 - 5.3 ??? The PMP450 has far better filtering than the ePMP. Rory -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:55 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 in 5.1 - 5.3 ??? Maybe the PMP450 is more kosher? bp On 10/2/2014 8:46 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: > How they managed to do it in the Epmp and PTP650 while not in the > PMP450 baffles me�. > > > > Gino A. Villarini > President > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > www.aeronetpr.com > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > On 10/2/14, 11:25 AM, "Matt via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >>> I believe a second HW model is planned for 4.9 � 5.3, different >>> filtering. >> Just what we needed, another part number to find room for in the >> service vehicles. Too bad they could not have done this on same >> hardware. >> >> >>> From: Gino Villarini via Af >>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 4:23 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 in 5.1 - 5.3 ??? >>> >>> Are there any plans for this? Is the HW capable? >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> President >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >
