Why cisco wasn’t fined? Or part of the investigation?
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 1:39 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MARRIOTT TO PAY $600, 000 TO RESOLVE WIFI-BLOCKING INVESTIGATION Interesting...so the Cisco wifi controller feature that can DOS rogue AP's with de-auth packets might actually be a crime to use? On 10/3/2014 1:27 PM, Hardy, Tim via Af wrote: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-329743A1.docx
