I've dealt with this before as a consultant for companies setting up systems at trade shows... Places where the convention center has "one" ISP they demand you use.
Get around any possible deauth requests by using a wired router with LTE-Advanced WAN interface and 100/1000 Mbps wired LAN interfaces. For example: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/819-integrated-services-router-isr/data_sheet_c78-678459.html If a convention center or hotel fucks with licensed band LTE frequencies, they're really in trouble. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > Interference as in RF interference from others on the same or nearby > channel is one thing. > > Actively disrupting a legal communication is another thing. That is never > legal. > > And since it is internet, and since internet is defined by the FCC as > interstate in nature, actively disrupting interstate commerce can be > considered an act of terrorism. They should consider themselves lucky. > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke via Af <af@afmug.com> > *Sent:* Friday, October 03, 2014 11:35 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] MARRIOTT TO PAY $600,000 TO RESOLVE WIFI-BLOCKING > INVESTIGATION > > Marriott are dicks, but here's an interesting question... > > > broad spectrum 2.4 or 5 GHz jammers are illegal, yeah. > > But is an 802.11-compliant device issuing deauth requests illegal, if > part-15 devices are supposed to accept any unwanted interference and > there's no recourse? > > Provided that the device issuing deauth requests is operating within spec > for EIRP, channel plan, etc. > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hardy, Tim via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-329743A1.docx >> > >
