I’ve always had a grip about a device of this type.  We run a wireless company 
as well as a fttx company and the one thing I can say about the fttx (goon) 
vendors is they gave done a really good job about giving the ONT’s really great 
intelligence , I wish the wireless vendors would take a page from there book.  
Regardless if it’s fiber in the middle or wireless those end point devices 
should have the intelligence as they do in the gpon world.  mff / dhcp snoop / 
mac base limiting / ip based limiting ect / bw profiles / cos management.  Just 
my 2 cents


Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com<mailto:car...@race.com> / 
http://www.race.com<http://www.race.com/>


From: Jeremy via Af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Sunday, October 5, 2014 at 7:58 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Customer install cost sensitivity

This is the best idea I've ever heard for a WISP business invention.  I LOVE 
the idea.  It would be really hard to justify the cost on customer installs.  I 
could see maybe bundling it into every business install.  It also becomes one 
more reason why our business installs are better.  We could power cycle it 
remotely, view statistics, etc.  I think I could justify it on every business 
account.

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:47 PM, timothy steele via Af 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
A cap that keeps ants/worms on of SM for tree installs would be nice

—
Sent from Mailbox<https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>



On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:45 PM, That One Guy via Af 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

then youre already putting in 5-20 dollars worth of cable, 20-35 dollars in 
surge protection. 5-15 dollars in mounting hardware in incidental costs aside 
from the CPE there isnt really much breathing room for residential 29-39 dollar 
connections. Especially in cases like us who eat the CPE cost.
The reality is it would be just one more piece of equipment for customers to 
plug in incorrectly, or even better, completely bypass.
That being said, I want it, and I want it to display the MAC address of the 
attached device so that when a customer gets a new router to self provision 
they can look on the display and know what it is, we still have CS staff 
telling them to look on the sticker on the router.. fucking dipshits.


E

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Honestly, a RB2011 fills that niche pretty well. Lock the LCD to display only 
WAN bandwidth, and disable the touchscreen. Techs can log into the RB2011 with 
the admin credentials and check on the wireless clients, interface errors, run 
speed tests (tcp) to the headend of your network, etc.

$5/mo for router management a month is what we charge, and the people that have 
the service love it.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com>

On 10/05/2014 01:18 PM, TJ Trout via Af wrote:

I would love to find a router that has poe output and all of the diagnostic 
features you mentioned. It would be nice if the customer could just look at the 
router to see the status of the connection up down or otherwise.

On Oct 5, 2014 2:13 PM, "Chris Fabien via Af" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

I'd say you are correct. Would love to have the functionality but even at $75 I 
couldn't justify the cost.

On Oct 5, 2014 5:08 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Following up on the previous email about product ideas, I have an idea for a 
product which at least I think would be really cool, but I also think would 
likely be a big flop, just because of the apparent cost sensitivity of installs.

It seems to me that it would be nice to replace the power injector at customer 
sites with more of an intelligent device.   One that provides functionality 
like traffic metering, cable diagnostics, customer-location speed tests, and so 
on.   The unit would have jacks for the radio, the customer equipment, and 
power.   It would also have a display which shows real-time usage data for the 
customer to be able to determine for themselves what their current internet 
consumption is.   There are a lot of natural outgrowths from this such as 
watchdog reset of the radio itself, automatic problem notification to the WISP, 
etc.   My goal would be to instrument this as much as possible.

If you think of this as a 'smart power meter' for internet, with diagnostic 
tools built in, then you've got the basic idea.  This is not intended to 
replace the customer router/nat device, and will only be a Layer 2 device as 
far as traffic goes.  There will likely be some limited traffic shaping 
possible based on the underlying ethernet swtich chipset.

Unfortunately, these can't be a $20 device.   $75 might be doable for higher 
volumes, but $100 is more in the comfort zone for the volumes I typically move. 
 Of course, this is a CPE device and I'm not even sure how many I'd sell so 
these prices are guesses at best - but more likely to go down instead of up.

Although I suspect most people would love to have one of these at each install, 
I have a hard time believing that most people would swallow adding even $75 to 
the cost of each install, let alone the $100 which might be the price I'd have 
to hit for lower volume.   Is this a fair assumption?  Would you add such a 
device to each install?








--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925


Reply via email to