I think all we're gonna get is 5, 7 or maybe 10MHz.
I presume this will be 450 based. It would be nice if we could get
25-26dBm Tx power, like we have on FSK now. We've done a lot of
sectorization using 4x90 and ABAB. Migrating sites with such limited
spectrum is going to be difficult. Which is why I suggested giving us
the option of SISO-only so that we can temporarily throw an H-pol omni
back up, run around and switch SMs out and then put up four new MIMO
sectors once the FSK is all gone.
And 900 sucks.
On 10/6/2014 1:13 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
smaller channels, higher throughput ala UBNT, and unicorn farts
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Adam Moffett via Af <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Survey done....I'm going to address a question you didn't ask in
the survey:
There are two things I hate about 900mhz: First is the lower
capacity, and a lot of the survey questions were pertinent to
that. The second is there is a ton of interference and that makes
it unreliable. I think it would be nice if a product could
deliver higher capacity in 900mhz, but I also think it would be
nice if we could get some rock solid IP connectivity without line
of sight, even if it was at a low speed. I won't presume to tell
Cambium how to do that, but maybe your next product could have an
option for very small channels, or FHSS, or maybe tx and rx on
different channels so I can avoid listening on a noisy channel at
the tower but still transmit on it.
I'd love to have more options in the toolbox to make a NLOS link
keep on chugging along for telemetry, or remote desktop, or a
single camera, or whatever.
As some of you may already be aware, we are conducting some
inquiries surrounding the 900 MHz band in order to properly
address concerns in using this band, and help provide us the
information needed to develop the product that you need to
deliver service to your customers. The survey is just over 20
questions, and is located here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/XNS38W6
Please help us help you!
Any information we gather will help us to make sure we’re
developing the right product for your needs, and this info will
not be used for any commercial or solicitation purposes. It’s
optional to fill in the contact info at the end, but I encourage
you to do so, in case further exploration of a few of the
responses could help even more.
The survey will stay open for about 2 weeks, so try to get to it
soon.
Let me know if you have any questions or problems accessing the
survey.
Thanks,
*Matt Mangriotis*
Senior Product Manager*
Cambium Networks**
*3800 Golf Road, Suite 360
Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
www.cambiumnetworks.com <http://www.cambiumnetworks.com>*
**O: *847-439-6379 <tel:847-439-6379>
*M: *630-308-9394 <tel:630-308-9394>*
E: *m...@cambiumnetworks.com <mailto:m...@cambiumnetworks.com>
CN_logo_horizontal_blueIcon_blackName
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
