24 GHz, 60 GHz, 80 GHz, ducting, etc.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Kuhnke via Af" <af@afmug.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 12:57:22 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes Unless you have TDD PTP links that fluctuate in available throughput wildly, sounds like a problem solvable by a grid of OSPF costs per PTP /30 matching different radio types. For example I have very different OSPF costs for each category of PTP link consisting of 80 GHz 1 Gbps FDD radios, Rocket M5s, Nanobeam M5-400s, 5.x GHz 256QAM TDD links (PTP600, etc). On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Jason McKemie via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: This is pretty much what I've been thinking from the get go on this stuff. The only advantage it has is being able to tell how much throughput is available on the fly and assigning traffic accordingly. On Thursday, October 16, 2014, Eric Kuhnke via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> Solution in search of a problem. What did it claim to do that you can't do with a properly designed OSPF + BGP + MPLS (and VRF) capable network? Then again, I don't use Mikrotik routers, I use power hungry Cisco or Juniper gear so I don't have to deal with Mikrotik's wonky implementation of BGP and MPLS. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> We pulled it off our ne twork last week. Bunch of money down the d rain. Not happy with the way Accedian handled this , on multiple fronts . It's not like they were strapped for cash. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/16/2014 04:32 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: <blockquote> We are going �to toss them Gino A. Villarini @gvillarini On Oct 16, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Chris Wright via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> 1.2.8.6_21016 released in June of this year. http://forum.performantnetworks.com/threads/2015.1438/ � Chris Wright Velociter Wireless � From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Matthew Jenkins via Af Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:20 PM To: Timothy D. McNabb via Af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes � I have a tub of equipment I really wanted to deploy. It's not being actively developed, so I have not deployed it. Are you running the latest software? -------- Original message -------- From: "Timothy D. McNabb via Af" < af@afmug.com > Date: 10/16/2014 1:58 PM (GMT-07:00) To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes Does anyone here on the list use Performant Nurons/Mind combination? What did you find worked best? � -Tim � From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Chris Wright via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:00 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes � We�ve been sitting on a Performant Mind and four Nurons for almost a year now. They sat for six months, then I spent another six months tinkering with them here and there. Regardless of their EOL, we�re looking to implement � but I�m running into the silliest of issues. I can�t even get traffic from the Mind to a Nuron to pass without 20% packet loss. This is without any routing, wireless backhauls, nothing. Just a VLAN-tagged NIC plugged straight into the Mind, Ethernet from Mind to a Nuron (where the vlan �pops�), then Ethernet to a second computer. � I�ve replaced the SFP adapters, the nuron, and verified none of the Ethernet cables are bad by literally coupling them all down a line and going straight from computer 1 to computer 2. No issue there. � This, combined with the fact that this stuff is going to be EOL in three years, is maddening. My boss was under the impression that this should be able to seamlessly integrate into our star topology (nuron at every tower making a ring), but we can�t even get basic LAN functions to work reliably. � Chris Wright Velociter Wireless � </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>