Sorry - didn't catch the extra P
I have one 5.4 version running. It's actually better on throughput
that I was expecting but we have seen long delays in getting it to
establish a link even with excellent signal strength.
Mark
On 10/22/14, 12:27 PM, Paul McCall via Af wrote:
I want to make sure we are on the same page. Not asking about the
PMP450 3.65 I am asking about the *PTP*450 3.65
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 3.65
I do have a 450 on a KP Omni with 44 customers on it. Seems to work
quite well so far. The longest is at 2.9 miles, most are inside 1 mile.
This is a very space constrained tower with a propensity for getting
hit by lightning.
At some point it will likely be converted to 4 sectors.
Mark
On 10/22/14, 11:53 AM, Matt via Af wrote:
>> Anybody using these yet? Results?
> Expensive. Works great. Omni results in less then half range if you
> go that way though.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net> 419.837.5015 x 1021
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015 x 1021
