Is it just me, or is no one realizing that we are still not that far from 2005 with wireless.
Yes, we have 300-1Gbps capable radios. But they trade that for larger channel allocations and even more signal to noise requirements. But the spectrum allocations haven’t changed enough to use these new features to their fullest in a radio dense environment. When doing cost analysis in my area last year for wireless I realized I had to forklift upgrade most of my network, and build towers out in a half mile range. This was to get the 30Mbps plan rates to really work. The costs were skyrocketing because of all the towers and sectors. I think the real winners of late are still the rural and low density wireless provider domains. They are the ones with clean enough spectrum to cost this competitively. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza via Af Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 6:41 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail Bring out the Holy Grenade of Antioch... Jaime Solorza On Oct 24, 2014 5:56 PM, "Jayson Baker via Af" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote: Anyone else get this email? Anyone know what it is?
