3Mhz below 902 and 3Mhz above 930 if memory serves me

Jaime Solorza
On Oct 25, 2014 6:57 AM, "Mike Hammett via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well that and the coverage sucks. They went too cheap on building the
> network, so it didn't actually work where it needed to.
>
> Could be M2M instead of end-user devices.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:20:09 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Sprint owned 6MHz in 900MHz?
>
> Sounds like Nextel/iDEN 2.0. It may be attractive for nationwide
> businesses like FedEx, UPS and DHL, etc. where you could have fleet
> management over a private broadband network. UPS gave up on their own
> private 220MHz network long ago and went to the cellco's. So what would be
> the point of trying to do this today? Cellular is already available, like
> everywhere.
>
> And equipment from Motorola Solutions? What, TRBO? Why? Two-way/PTT was
> the cool thing back in the day. Today, you make a phone call or send a text
> message. Two-way still has its place, but it's limited.
>
> Public safety agencies? No. In Illinois we have the Motorola owned and
> operated Starcom-21 and a majority of the cities and counties don't want to
> pay Motorola access and equipment fees. Only the agencies that already had
> a Motorola trunked network went to Starcom-21 because they got very reduced
> rates from surrendering their 800 licenses and tower leases to Motorola.
> Yet another reason why Motorola went to shit. You're never gonna get all of
> the agencies to agree on anything.
>
> On 10/24/2014 11:36 PM, Jason McKemie via Af wrote:
>
> Not particularly surprising given the billions of dollars some companies
> are throwing at startups for something they could do themselves for $100
> million or so.
>
> On Friday, October 24, 2014, Rory Conaway via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  I was thinking the same thing.  You would think there are better uses
>> for $200M.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
>> via Af
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 9:20 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Sprint owned 6MHz in 900MHz?
>>
>>
>>
>> Better question is what are they smoking that makes them think they're
>> going to do broadband in 2 3MHz channels? Presumably 3 for uplink and 3 for
>> downlink.
>>
>> On Friday, October 24, 2014, Rory Conaway via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/sprint-sells-900-mhz-spectrum-firm-led-nextel-co-founders/2014-09-17
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory Conaway
>> Triad Wireless
>> 4226 S. 37th Street
>> Phoenix, Az.  85040
>> 602-426-0542
>> [email protected]
>> www.triadwireless.net
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to