Yeahbut, it appears QAM has won?  Yes?
LTE doesn’t  have much in common with CDMA anymore.

From: Chuck Macenski via Af 
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

Actually...CDMA techniques (PN modulation) re-channel a band based on time 
rather than frequency. In a multi point environment, this allows multiple 
people to share a frequency bandwidth in a not terribly inefficient way when 
all of the simultaneous communication paths are considered.


On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

  Yeah, isochronous pseudorandom noise mod/demod techniques will pull info from 
sewer.  I think  the deep  space network uses some of those techniques.  But PN 
modulation does not help throughput.  It wastes bandwidth.  

  Speed/interference immunity/narrow channels – pick one.   

  From: Bill Prince via Af 
  Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:27 AM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

  The holy grail would be the ability to modulate a signal and receive it 
correctly in the face of withering interference.

  The GPS system accomplishes that through the technique of encoding the data 
within "pseudo noise".  The only problem being that GPS data is relatively 
static compared to what we deal with.



bpOn 10/25/2014 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

    I think folks without deep experience in either 1) operating a WISP or 
2)without deep experience in electrodynamics and modulation (99.999% of the 
general population) somehow think that Moore’s Law applies to wireless.  

    The only way to scale this this stuff in a way approximating Moore’s Law is 
to just keep adding cell/ap sites.  

    I read a book back in 1990 that outlined this problem for the nascent cell 
phone industry.  The book is still spot on.  

    From: Rory Conaway via Af 
    Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:41 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

    Or looky, looky, AC PTMP MU-MIMO.  Imagine what that would do for White 
Space.



    Rory



    From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy via Af
    Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



    Sterling, thank you! I think you and me must be the only ones who can see 
the elephant...... OH LOOKY LOOKY AC PTMP!!



    On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af <af@afmug.com> 
wrote:

    Is it just me, or is no one realizing that we are still not that far from 
2005 with wireless.



    Yes, we have 300-1Gbps capable radios. 

    But they trade that for larger channel allocations and even more signal to 
noise requirements.



    But the spectrum allocations haven’t changed enough to use these new 
features to their fullest in a radio dense environment.



    When doing cost analysis in my area last year for wireless I realized I had 
to forklift upgrade most of my network, and build towers out in a half mile 
range.



    This was to get the 30Mbps plan rates to really work.



    The costs were skyrocketing because of all the towers and sectors.



    I think the real winners of late are still the rural and low density 
wireless provider domains.

    They are the ones with clean enough spectrum to cost this competitively.







    From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza via Af
    Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 6:41 PM
    To: Animal Farm
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



    Bring out the Holy Grenade of Antioch...

    Jaime Solorza

    On Oct 24, 2014 5:56 PM, "Jayson Baker via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote:

      Anyone else get this email?



      Anyone know what it is?







    -- 

    All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't 
get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a 
hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Reply via email to