They are. I believe RF Elements is the OEM for a few other things across the 
industry as well. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof via Af" <af@afmug.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02:54 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits 




Oh, wait, you’re talking about ePMP sectors? Are those Laird? I thought they 
were made by RF Elements. 




From: Ken Hohhof via Af 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:01 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits 




I think you’re being unfair to the Laird sourced Cambium sectors. As long as 
you choose the “Gen II” or “Gen III” KP sectors, those should be good choices 
as well, and maybe a little better price. Main differences I think would be: 

KP specifies beamwidth at 3 dB points 
KP has built in downtilt 

Cambium has bracket to hold a 450 AP papoose style 
Cambium has null fill 
Cambium brackets are hot dip galvanized with stainless steel hardware 

The mechanical design and connector placement are different, you may prefer one 
or the other. Some people have complained about the stainless steel hardware, 
but they are standard bolts and nuts so you could replace them or substitute 
silicon bronze nuts or use antiseize. Or buy the KP antennas. 

Laird makes many products and has acquired many companies, I don’t think you 
can paint all their products with one brush. And as an example, some people 
have cast aspersions (asparagus if you’re Louie Gohmert) on the Cushcraft 15 
dBi yagi, actually I’ve found it performs very well. The Pac Wireless wire 
grids however are junk, they turn to rust in about 5 years. 





From: Josh Luthman via Af 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 6:44 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits 


Uhm I'd recommend beer cans over Laird sectors. KP is an excellent choice. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Nov 17, 2014 7:39 PM, "Keith Fletcher via Af" < af@afmug.com > wrote: 



You recommend KP sectors over Cambium sectors? 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Josh Luthman via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Yes, sorry 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:34 PM, TJ Trout via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

20mhz? 


On Nov 14, 2014 8:12 AM, "Josh Luthman via Af" < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>




Note these 20 second tests were done on an internally timed AP on a KP sector 
with a downlink of -40 and uplink -60 (yay ATP) 

2.3 release 
Downlink 85.228 Mbps 
Uplink 21.986 Mbps 
Aggregate 107.214 Mbps 

^ This never deviated more than 1 Mbps (less than 1%!) 

2.3.1rc3 
Downlink 
81.259 Mbps 
Uplink 
19.326 Mbps 
Aggregate 
100.585 Mbps 

Downlink 
83.977 Mbps 
Uplink 
19.22 Mbps 
Aggregate 
103.197 Mbps 

Downlink 
83.161 Mbps 
Uplink 
19.34 Mbps 
Aggregate 
102.501 Mbps 

Definitely deploying 2.3 both due to more/stable bandwidth and the fact it is a 
release =) 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 



<blockquote>

Latest release* 2.3 

I'll slap on 2.3.1 when I get some downtime at the office tomorrow. 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mike Hammett via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>


All the way to 2.3.1? 






----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Luthman via Af" < af@afmug.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:11:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits 


Latest firmware just got me 110 megs aggregate on a wireless test. That's not 
bad in 20 MHz MIMO especially when it has fixed scheduling. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Nov 13, 2014 8:37 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>


I prefer ePMP over 450 as I can afford to buy multiple of them and use sectors 
instead of omnis. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Kurt Fankhauser via Af" < af@afmug.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 7:04:47 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits 

this is why i prefer 450 over epmp on omnis, cant hit legal eirp with the omni 

Sent from my iPhone 

Kurt Fankhauser 
Wavelinc Communications 
P.O. Box 126 
Bucyrus, OH 44820 
http://www.wavelinc.com 
tel. 419-562-6405 
fax. 419-617-0110 

> On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Josh Luthman via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 
> 
> Neat pop up!!! This is a nonsync integrated unit. 
> 
> 19:00:28 The Transmitter Output Power limitations 5.x GHz bands are: 
> 
> For ETSI and FCC regions: 
> 5.1-5.2 GHz: 18 dBm 
> 5.47-5.725 GHz: 13-16 dBm 
> 5.725-5.88 GHz: 23 dBm 
> 
> For other regions: 
> 5.1-5.47 GHz: 27 dBm 
> 5.47-5.88 GHz: 30 dBm 
> 
> Josh Luthman 
> Office: 937-552-2340 
> Direct: 937-552-2343 
> 1100 Wayne St 
> Suite 1337 
> Troy, OH 45373 





</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>

Reply via email to