Almost always ignore any range specifications a manufacturer has. Just do the 
power calculations for yourself. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jason McKemie via Af" <af@afmug.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:32:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has anyone worked with the Ruckus Xclaim yet? 

Not much, but I'm not looking to use the outdoor version with my phone, so moot 
point. I'm interested in using it for small cell deployments, which go further 
than 400 ft. This may just be a guideline that ubiquiti came up with for use 
with typical end user devices, but since it is a very specific number and is 
listed on their spec sheet I thought that there might be more to it. 

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 




How much range do you think y our phone has? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Jason McKemie via Af" < af@afmug.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 4:37:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has anyone worked with the Ruckus Xclaim yet? 

I haven't used them, but Ubiquiti claims that unifi has a range of only a few 
hundred feet (software limited I assume). You think xclaim carries this same 
limitation? 

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Rory Conaway via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>



I’ve got an indoor unit. Seems to work okay. Can’t do much with it though until 
they get a management program. I’d suspect the outdoor range is very similar to 
Ubiquiti. 

Rory 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af 
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:02 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has anyone worked with the Ruckus Xclaim yet? 

Has anyone used these as of yet? Does the outdoor version have range 
limitations similar to unifi? 

On Sunday, November 9, 2014, Rory Conaway via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 


Thanks. I’m shocked that you can get an additional 20% it and I didn’t realize 
it had a distribution channel. I assumed at that price point it was direct. 

It would need at least a windows or cloud support for us to use it though. 
Setting up a VPN tunnel wouldn’t be a problem but managing a few hundred from a 
phone, not the best option. The thing that shocked me was the outdoor unit cost 
for 802.11AC. $200 less than Ubiquiti and as you suggest, a 20% discount, 
that’s huge. 

I’m also very interested in the dual-band indoor, especially at $120. 

Rory 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Darin Steffl via Af 
Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 8:31 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Has anyone worked with the Ruckus Xclaim yet? 


I have one at home to play with. I generally like it but for now you can only 
support and manage it with an Android or iOS app with no cloud support... yet. 
They say it is coming so we can manage multi-site and remotely like UniFi but 
for now you have to be on the layer2 network with the AP's to configure them. 
Performance seems similar to UniFi but there are added improvements like auto 
channel scan and band steering and some QOS built-in. 



There is very little that can be configured yet. You can select channel but not 
channel size and the auto channel selection has caused a few issues with packet 
loss while the channels change but once it scans the entire band, it is very 
stable. We get 20% off by buying through a reseller so followup with Xclaim on 
who their preferred distributor is. 



On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Rory Conaway via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: 


Pricing is really good, especially on the GHz products. Hard to believe someone 
could undercut Ubiquiti and if the Ruckus firmware quality is there, I sense a 
war coming. 

Rory Conaway 
Triad Wireless 
4226 S. 37th Street 
Phoenix, Az. 85040 
602-426-0542 
r...@triadwireless.net 
www.triadwireless.net 






-- 


Darin Steffl 

Minnesota WiFi 

www.mnwifi.com 

507-634-WiFi 

Like us on Facebook 



</blockquote>

Reply via email to