I don't know anyone using GPS on ubnt On December 23, 2014 4:23:20 PM AKST, "Jerry Richardson (airCloud) via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: >Our region is pretty noisy and getting noisier. Currently we are using >Ubnt >Rocket 90deg sectors although I have considered these to really be more >like >75 degrees due UBNT using -6dB as the rolloff point. > > > >We have seen a dramatic improvement with a Titanium sector and plan on >replacing the other rockets with Titaniums and considering going to >60deg or >maybe even 45 degree and using GPS sync to reuse channels. > > > >What if any have been your experiences with going to narrower sectors >for a >given area? I would expect to see ~3dB improvement in links just by >reducing >the antenna pattern, and ~3dB due to power density. Additional gains >might >be made from improved F/B rejection and improved shielding, possibly >another >~3dB? This could mean anywhere from 6-9dB improvement on every link. > > > >What are your experiences with UBNT GPS? We would not use dynamic, but >rather fixed downlink %. I know we will give up some B/W but better >spectrum >management might be worth the trade. The link improvements should push >the >radios into higher modulation further mitigating the loss by using GPS > > > >Thoughts? > >Comments? > > > >Jerry > > > >
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
