This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs from a
powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites could easily
exceed this number.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
> 255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using a
> later version of the kernel.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually when
>> we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing while we
>> are preparing a new link or something.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of IPs
>>> you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We havent
>>> found a limit in the Imagestreams.
>>>
>>> Is there a limit on Mikrotik?
>>>
>>> --
>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
>>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> bp
>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>
>
>
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
