Hi,

I need to check the numbers (I am half asleep), but, yes, that sounds
correct.

Chuck

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, am I understanding correctly... If you are on a 50MHz Channel BW with
> a signal of -58 you need a noise floor of -97 to maintain 1024QAM.  So, if
> the noise floor is -75 we are 22db off so you can add that to -58 and
> figure -80, or QPSK.  Is this the correct math?
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Chuck Macenski <ch...@macenski.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe the number you are looking for is the sensitivity per
>> modulation rate minus the base noise floor for a given bandwidth (see
>> Matt's earlier post). This gives you the required signal over the noise
>> floor. If the noise floor goes up, the effective sensitivity goes up
>> accordingly.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  This.
>>>
>>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
>>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2015 11:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt, that doesn't really help.
>>>
>>> In many areas, my noise/interference/whatever is -75. If I knew how much 
>>> margin was required per modulation, I could figure out how much signal I 
>>> need for that speed.
>>>
>>> I can't do that with your published numbers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Matt Hardy <m...@ubnt.com> <m...@ubnt.com>
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:42:52 -0600 (CST)
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Af5
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>> The numbers in our datasheet do convey the SNR (which assumes AWGN for
>>> noise value); this is pretty standard among all our datasheets.
>>> The noise floor value varies based on channel BW, so a rough estimate for
>>> noise floor would be (50MHz=-97dBm, 40=-98dBm, 30=-99dBm, 20=-101dBm,
>>> 10=-104dBm).
>>>
>>> As far as transmit power / modulation, all modulations up to 64QAM can run
>>> at full transmit power. 256QAM is ~2dB lower, and 1024QAM is something like
>>> 4dB lower (it depends on other external factors).
>>>
>>> All of this and more is already provided with the integrated link
>>> configuration tool, including channel bandwidth, duplex frequency spacing,
>>> TX power and a bunch of other stuff. It's recommended to use this tool to
>>> configure links because of all of the additional factors.
>>>
>>> But if you need to run a simple link calc to estimate a link's performance
>>> at certain distance, you should have enough info.
>>>
>>> Hope that helps...
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> 
>>> <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Not at all, Matt. Those are receive sensitivities.
>>>
>>>
>>> The left side of this picture is needed for the airFibers. You publish the
>>> right side only.
>>>
>>>
>>> This information is also not available for the airFibers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Matt Hardy" <m...@ubnt.com> <m...@ubnt.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Friday, January 9, 2015 5:34:43 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Af5
>>>
>>> This?
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> 
>>> <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Hard to tell because they won't publish their Tx and SNR requirements.
>>> I'd just make educated guesses and plug it into a path calc.
>>>
>>> BTW: Ben, Matt... where are those numbers?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 3:24:58 PM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Af5
>>>
>>> I have used some AF 24 hours but no AF5 for backhaul yet what is the max
>>> distance people are seeing for the AF 5 at full modulation
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to