Was just speaking regarding the platform as a whole. Depends on how large the restaurant is. I've been to a few that'd need more than one AP. ;-)
If you need more than one AP and you have mobile\nomadic users, fast handoff is a nice feature to have. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Crum" <cc...@wispmon.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:14:36 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant I wonder how much hand off is happening at all in a restaurant? On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Not really? All of the ones I setup I don't recall there being any issues... even with the original software releases. That said, the fast handoff isn't as good as what you're going to get from Ruckus or Xirrus. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "joseph marsh" < bwireless...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:53:04 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant Isnt unifi a bitch to set up with software? On Jan 13, 2015 9:51 AM, "Jaime Solorza" < losguyswirel...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Wyndam in Midland uses UniFi AC and it worked well. The local reservation casino is implementing it as well after testing Cisco and few others. Jaime Solorza On Jan 13, 2015 7:51 AM, "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > wrote: <blockquote> Xirrus. More granular packet control. Rory From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:47 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant Meraki Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: joseph marsh < bwireless...@gmail.com > Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 10:43 AM To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant Doing WiFi for a restaurant what would be good for deploying WiFi Ubnt unifi, meraki or something else? </blockquote> </blockquote>
