Most licensed radios (PtP that is) already use LDPC, FEC (usually Reed 
Solomon), CRC, etc.  What SAF uses specifically depends on the radio.

 

Patrick knows way more about HARQ than I do – I just read the Wikipedia article 
again to remind me and wished I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night (my son with 
a nightmare kicked me out of bed to be close to mom).

 

SAF offers a weak FEC and strong FEC option on most radios at the highest 
modulation to trade capacity for more RX sensitivity.

 

I was talking more about things like OFDM…

 

Actually long term roadmap – I could see Frequency Diversity coming back into 
vogue.  Maybe in a 2x2 + 2x2 MIMO type of way (or is 2x2 MIMO just an XPIC 
config :-D

 




Daniel White | Managing Director

SAF North America LLC


 

Cell:

 

(303) 746-3590


Skype:

danieldwhite


E-mail:

 <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com 

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

 

I just actually dug up the numbers and actually, the LTE receive sensitivity 
that Patrick was talking about are within a dB or two of the SIAE datasheet I 
have open at 64 QAM. He then talks about 8.5 dB of additional receive gain via 
4x4 and HARQ. *shrugs* Every dB helps.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 

  _____  

From: "Daniel White" <afmu...@gmail.com <mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:52:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

Licensed vendors can’t use many of the tricks unlicensed, or low frequency, 
vendors get to use.

 

The space is regulated much differently.

 


  
<http://127.0.0.1:36958/service/home/%7E/?auth=co&id=1de3965e-b725-4c61-b23b-9b05aabb2124:40252&part=2>
 

Daniel White | Managing Director

SAF North America LLC


 

Cell:

 

(303) 746-3590


Skype:

danieldwhite


E-mail:

 <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com 

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 7:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

 

Well right, we need more bandwidth per link, but also that in many areas 
there's no links to be had, so we have to make do with what we have.

For instance in that spot I'm working on the GigE links for, there's no 6 GHz, 
11 GHz and only 2x horizontal 18 GHz licenses available. It's not exactly 
suburbia or HFT alley, either.

I think the next step will have to be IP20 type solutions from more vendors.

Patrick is talking all kinds of engineering finesse that lowers how much signal 
LTE needs to work well by like 10 - 15 dB. I wonder how much of that would help 
licensed links. The thought there is that having more signal to work with means 
that higher QAMs aren't as fragile as without that fanciness.


Roadmap to 10G via licensed, anyone?



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 

  _____  

From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com <mailto:af...@kwisp.com> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:41:42 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

All good points, not sure they address Erich’s issue of needing more bandwidth 
per link without multiple antennas per link on the tower.  I think he’s saying 
an IP20 class radio is too expensive, and over the next few years lots of us 
are going to need that kind of radio.

 

From: Mike Hammett <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>  

Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:27 AM

To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

 

Pull all of the active licenses with old ass gear and feed their contact 
information to the vendors?  ;-) Maybe newer gear for hte existing guys would 
cut down on how much they need.  ;-)



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 

  _____  

From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:25:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

10 GHz unlicensed would help. I sometimes think the license protections are a 
bit excessive.

Maybe loosen the geographic restrictions on 7 GHz and 13 GHz?

Maybe some effort into getting 4 GHz and other legacy PtP bands opened back up? 
They don't have a ton of room and don't allow for huge channels, but some is 
better than none and maybe since the HFT guys care more about lower latency and 
less about throughput, they''ll build longer hops and leave our 11 and 6 gig 
alone?  ;-)



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 

  _____  

From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:18:58 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

You could drive around to all of the HFT sites and look for links that are no 
longer there, but still licensed. Document. Come back 30 days later and 
document again, submit to the FCC (or wherever Liz says is best) and have those 
licenses revoked. ;-)

But yeah, I do like Ceragon's 4x4 setup. Two radio heads, four transmitters, 
two licenses, tons of bandwidth.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 

  _____  

From: "Erich Kaiser" <er...@northcentraltower.com 
<mailto:er...@northcentraltower.com> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:15:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

The conversation goes deeper.  In several areas we are out of spectrum, it may 
be due to HFT or just plain out.  So most WISPs if they have deployed Licensed, 
they have to deal with what spectrum they have.   The question is, where do you 
see the licensed backhaul market in the next few years, are they just going to 
be adding qams or finding other creative ways to add capacity?   I am not in 
the WISP business anymore so I have decided to try and focus on the things that 
drove me nuts to help others. 

 

Erich Kaiser 

North Central Tower Consulting

er...@northcentraltower.com <mailto:er...@northcentraltower.com> 

Office: 630-621-4804

Cell: 630-777-9291

 

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com 
<mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Your issue is really then with promo’s and capacity keys – which is marketing 
and different ways to make revenue on a product.

 

Just like the PtMP space, not all PtP vendors do capacity keys and play those 
games either.  

 

Daniel White

(303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of Erich Kaiser
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous

 

>From my experience the price has not changed very much.  Someone needs to take 
>the reigns on the market.  Even with certain companies throwing you a promo 
>price, if you really look at it fully loaded, the price is still high for what 
>you get.

 

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Jason McKemie 
<j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > 
wrote:

I think we're already seeing it.  They're not wifi chipset based radio kind of 
prices, but they can be found for less than half of what you could get them for 
just a few years ago.

 

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Erich Kaiser <er...@northcentraltower.com 
<mailto:er...@northcentraltower.com> > wrote:

After several years, when will we see Licensed radios come down in price?  
There is so much margin in these things.  Its ridiculous....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to