Re: [AFMUG] Radio Mobile Land Cover Question

[Adam Moffett]

I typically set the tree density to 400%.  Any less than that and I 
think it's too optimistic.  Your trees may vary.
If I'm doing primarily 5 GHz and is therefore safe to assume that any 
tree is a dead signal, any reason to not just set Radio Mobile Land 
Cover values to 100% density for all forests and woodlands?

I'm also not sure on those heights either. 50' trees? Maybe, but I bet 
you they're 60' - 80' tall. What kind of trees? *shrugs* I'm not an 
arborist. I'm guessing maples and oaks.

The coverage it generated was very optimistic, given that trees exist. 
I do see those areas flagged as tree areas, it must think it's winter 
all the time here.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>