Kind of like Schrodinger’s tree. On average, sir, you have 30 ft half maple-pine hybrids. But when we open the box, there will either be 60 ft trees or open fields. Oh, and you have 1.5 children.
From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 8:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Radio Mobile Land Cover Question Really depends on two factors; 1 is the kind of three, for instance pine, etc will attenuate the singnal much more than non-pine. Normally for 5ghz we would add quite a bit, more like 8000 to those, the second is the height, it has to be set to an average in your area. Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc. 314-735-0270 From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Radio Mobile Land Cover Question I typically set the tree density to 400%. Any less than that and I think it's too optimistic. Your trees may vary. If I'm doing primarily 5 GHz and is therefore safe to assume that any tree is a dead signal, any reason to not just set Radio Mobile Land Cover values to 100% density for all forests and woodlands? I'm also not sure on those heights either. 50' trees? Maybe, but I bet you they're 60' - 80' tall. What kind of trees? *shrugs* I'm not an arborist. I'm guessing maples and oaks. The coverage it generated was very optimistic, given that trees exist. I do see those areas flagged as tree areas, it must think it's winter all the time here. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
