I have the Puck deployed on all radios. I have 1 site that is Syncing
off the Puck, but powered via a sync injector. I was having ethernet
issues (interface bouncing/negotiation) until I disabled Sync on that
port in the Sync Injector. It's been fine since.
On 1/30/2015 9:07 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
We are installing both and using CMM, CTM, SyncInjectors until
something stops working S.O.P. and then have the pucks to use to get
us by. Saved us many tower climbs already. As a rule, we keep the
back to back APs on the same sync source (SOP or puck) and that seems
to work fine, even with the other 2 back to back APs on the original
SOP sync source.
Paul
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Baird
*Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2015 9:23 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Epmp sync ? Sync injector or puck?
So Cambium is basically telling people not to use SyncInjectors? Funny.
I haven't heard that one before.
Josh
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Darren Shea <darr...@ecpi.com
<mailto:darr...@ecpi.com>> wrote:
TJ,
We’ve seen occasional issues with the ePMP APs in the field losing the
sync-over-power pulse from SyncInjectors and CTM-2Ms, and Cambium
responded to my trouble ticket with the following: “There has been
extensive discussion/testing here regarding supported/compatible third
party Sync/power sources for ePMP APs. We noticed sync compatibility
issues when using packetflux sync injectors.”
My advice is to deploy with the puck antenna and use it as your
primary sync source, and keep the SyncInjector oprerational as a
backup. The onboard GPS seems to be stable, and appears to be less
likely to make your customers call you complaining, “the Internet is
down!”
- Darren
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>]
*On Behalf Of *TJ Trout
*Sent:* Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:23 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Epmp sync ? Sync injector or puck?
Any advantges to using sync Injectors or Cmm for epmp or is the puck
just as good ?