The forbearance process, changeable at any time for any politically expedient 
reason, scares me.    It's 'executive authority' all over again and makes a 
mockery of the rule of law and the democratic process. 

Mark


> On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:57 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> 
> But the only permanent part of this I see is being reclassified as a utility. 
>  Everything else including forbearing from most of the bad stuff is totally 
> up to change, with very little upside and tons of downside.  It would be 
> different if this was proposed legislation, it wouldn't be changeable at the 
> whim of future FCC commissioners.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: David
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:52 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] "Net neutrality"
> 
> I hope so.. Because I can be Extreme :)
> 
>> On 02/05/2015 02:46 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>> Steve's talk about this yesterday lead me to believe this is something we 
>> can live with.
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Brett A Mansfield
>> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:28 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] "Net neutrality"
>> 
>> I just ready yet another article on the so called "net neutrality" the FCC 
>> will be voting on Feb 26th. This government overreach is going to force me 
>> to have to register to collect taxes on all of my customers, which I'll need 
>> to pay someone to do for me to make sure I stay in compliance, which will 
>> require that I raise prices to cover my increased costs.
>> 
>> It will also prevent me from being able to run any kind of QoS on my 
>> network, so goodbye to any decent VoIP calls.
>> 
>> I for one would like to keep the government out of my business beyond what 
>> they already are. The article I read stated that it will likely pass. If it 
>> does, I think something very "extreme" may need to be done. If in protest 
>> every ISP in the USA shut down their networks either until the law was 
>> repealed or for just a day or two strike I think the government would get 
>> the picture, and if they didn't then the millions of people complaining to 
>> them about it would certainly help.
>> 
>> I know that is very extreme, but just a thought. Anyone else have any ideas? 
>> Perhaps if we just threaten to do so may help?  I'm just spitballing here, 
>> so please don't think I'm being to crazy. I just want the discussion to 
>> begin of what we could really do to stop this.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Brett A Mansfield
> 
> 

Reply via email to