Iirc Rory wanted a Telrad vs Cambium 450 shootout… not the 320
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: Patrick Leary <patrickleary.af...@gmail.com<mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 9:24 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: [AFMUG] COMPACT vs. PMP450 Shootout Comment Rory, so this is not buried in the last thread: "We have seen exceptional results when testing Telrad’s equipment. Our terrain is rough at best, abrupt elevation changes with thick forests throughout our network footprint. We have tested both the Cambium PMP450 product in the past, with minimal success when dealing with NLOS due to foliage (the link would disappear after a few hundred meters of NLOS coverage). Our testing so far with the Telrad COMPACT1000 and their CPE7000 outdoor CPE has been excellent. We successfully completed our latest field testing with most tests taking place 4 miles from the tower/sector (where current Cambium PMP320 customers reside), with us testing the limits of the base stations coverage with successful connections at 10 miles away on a side/backlobe, and over 13 miles away with data and VoIP. Testing back to back between Cambium and Telrad products on the same tower at the same azimuth, we found an average of 10dB better RF levels with Telrad’s equipment." - Name Withheld Upon Request -- Patrick Leary Director BD, North America, Telrad 727.501.3735 patrickleary.af...@gmail.com<mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> [this address is only for AFMUG] patrick.le...@telrad.com<mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate address]
